Controlling Complex Networks with Compensatory Perturbations

The response of complex networks to perturbations is of utmost importance in areas as diverse as ecosystem management, emergency response, and cell reprogramming. A fundamental property of networks is that the perturbation of one node can affect other nodes, in a process that may cause the entire or substantial part of the system to change behavior and possibly collapse. Recent research in metabolic and food-web networks has demonstrated the concept that network damage caused by external perturbations can often be mitigated or reversed by the application of compensatory perturbations. Compensatory perturbations are constrained to be physically admissible and amenable to implementation on the network. However, the systematic identification of compensatory perturbations that conform to these constraints remains an open problem. Here, we present a method to construct compensatory perturbations that can control the fate of general networks under such constraints. Our approach accounts for the full nonlinear behavior of real complex networks and can bring the system to a desirable target state even when this state is not directly accessible. Applications to genetic networks show that compensatory perturbations are effective even when limited to a small fraction of all nodes in the network and that they are far more effective when limited to the highest-degree nodes. The approach is conceptually simple and computationally efficient, making it suitable for the rescue, control, and reprogramming of large complex networks in various domains.

[1]  A. Motter,et al.  Rescuing ecosystems from extinction cascades through compensatory perturbations. , 2011, Nature communications.

[2]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[5]  Cole,et al.  Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Edward Ott,et al.  Controlling chaos , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[7]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[9]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[10]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Evidence for self-organized criticality in a time series of electric power system blackouts , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[11]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean Networks - The Modeling and Control of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2010 .

[12]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[13]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network medicine : a network-based approach to human disease , 2010 .

[14]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Predicting synthetic rescues in metabolic networks , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Adilson E Motter Cascade control and defense in complex networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[16]  Sean P. Meyn Control Techniques for Complex Networks: Workload , 2007 .

[17]  A. Vespignani Predicting the Behavior of Techno-Social Systems , 2009, Science.

[18]  A. Vicino,et al.  On the estimation of asymptotic stability regions: State of the art and new proposals , 1985 .

[19]  Mw Hirsch,et al.  Chaos In Dynamical Systems , 2016 .

[20]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms , 2007, Technometrics.

[21]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Sequential Quadratic Programming , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[22]  Adilson E. Motter,et al.  Stochastic Model for Power Grid Dynamics , 2006, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[23]  S. P. Cornelius,et al.  Dispensability of Escherichia coli’s latent pathways , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[25]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[26]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[27]  Robert Lanza,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[28]  Adilson E Motter,et al.  Improved network performance via antagonism: From synthetic rescues to multi-drug combinations , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[29]  Ching-tai Lin Structural controllability , 1974 .

[30]  V. E. Lynch,et al.  Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts. , 2002, Chaos.

[31]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Scale-Free Networks , 2007 .

[32]  E. Kaslik,et al.  Methods for determination and approximation of the domain of attraction , 2004 .

[33]  Jorge Cortes,et al.  Distributed Control of Robotic Networks: A Mathematical Approach to Motion Coordination Algorithms , 2009 .

[34]  T. Carroll,et al.  Master Stability Functions for Synchronized Coupled Systems , 1998 .