To avoid unpractical optimal design without support

In some cases, topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to applied loads having a zero resultant force may result in an unpractical design without support. This phenomenon occurs because the original optimization problem neglects the possible change of the direction of applied load. This brief note sheds the light on avoiding such an unpractical design from the engineering viewpoint. In our work, this usually neglected phenomenon is systematically illustrated by employing a series of two-dimensional (2D) cantilever design problems using a simple and efficient Bi-directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) method. An alternative scheme is further recommended to tackle the concerned conundrum. The proposed scheme not only can avoid unpractical designs without any support, but also takes into account the inherent uncertainty property in designing actual engineering structures.

[1]  Klaus Hackl,et al.  An evolutionary topology optimization approach with variationally controlled growth , 2016 .

[2]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  A simple and compact Python code for complex 3D topology optimization , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[3]  J. Lógó,et al.  Optimal Topologies in Case of Probabilistic Loading: The Influence of Load Correlation , 2009 .

[4]  Klaus Hackl,et al.  A variational growth approach to topology optimization , 2015 .

[5]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization , 1991 .

[6]  A. Csébfalvi.  Structural optimization under uncertainty in loading directions: Benchmark results , 2018, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[7]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Introducing Loading Uncertainty in Topology Optimization , 2009 .

[8]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab , 2001 .

[9]  K. Hackl,et al.  A discontinuous phase field approach to variational growth-based topology optimization , 2016 .

[10]  Y. Xie,et al.  Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method , 2007 .

[11]  Peter D. Dunning,et al.  Robust Topology Optimization: Minimization of Expected and Variance of Compliance , 2013 .

[12]  Andres Tovar,et al.  An efficient 3D topology optimization code written in Matlab , 2014 .

[13]  Y. Xie,et al.  A new look at ESO and BESO optimization methods , 2007 .

[14]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  A level set method for structural topology optimization , 2003 .

[15]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Combining genetic algorithms with BESO for topology optimization , 2009 .

[16]  Y. Xie,et al.  Bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with one or multiple materials , 2009 .

[17]  G. Allaire,et al.  Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method , 2004 .

[18]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[19]  Anikó Csébfalvi.  Robust Topology Optimization: A New Algorithm for Volume-constrained Expected Compliance Minimization with Probabilistic Loading Directions using Exact Analytical Objective and Gradient , 2016 .

[20]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[21]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Optimal design of periodic structures using evolutionary topology optimization , 2008 .

[22]  Y. Xie,et al.  A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization , 1993 .

[23]  Y. Xie,et al.  Layout optimization of continuum structures considering the probabilistic and fuzzy directional uncertainty of applied loads based on the cloud model , 2016 .