Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish

Summary The ubiquity of consistent inter-individual differences in behavior (“animal personalities”) [1, 2] suggests that they might play a fundamental role in driving the movements and functioning of animal groups [3, 4], including their collective decision-making, foraging performance, and predator avoidance. Despite increasing evidence that highlights their importance [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16], we still lack a unified mechanistic framework to explain and to predict how consistent inter-individual differences may drive collective behavior. Here we investigate how the structure, leadership, movement dynamics, and foraging performance of groups can emerge from inter-individual differences by high-resolution tracking of known behavioral types in free-swimming stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) shoals. We show that individual’s propensity to stay near others, measured by a classic “sociability” assay, was negatively linked to swim speed across a range of contexts, and predicted spatial positioning and leadership within groups as well as differences in structure and movement dynamics between groups. In turn, this trait, together with individual’s exploratory tendency, measured by a classic “boldness” assay, explained individual and group foraging performance. These effects of consistent individual differences on group-level states emerged naturally from a generic model of self-organizing groups composed of individuals differing in speed and goal-orientedness. Our study provides experimental and theoretical evidence for a simple mechanism to explain the emergence of collective behavior from consistent individual differences, including variation in the structure, leadership, movement dynamics, and functional capabilities of groups, across social and ecological scales. In addition, we demonstrate individual performance is conditional on group composition, indicating how social selection may drive behavioral differentiation between individuals.

[1]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  B. Borg,et al.  Mechanisms in the Photoperiodic Control of Reproduction in the Stickleback , 2004 .

[3]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Social Feedback and the Emergence of Leaders and Followers , 2009, Current Biology.

[4]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Potential Leaders Trade Off Goal-Oriented and Socially Oriented Behavior in Mobile Animal Groups , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[6]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[7]  Lennart Persson,et al.  Prey Refuges Affecting Interactions Between Piscivorous Perch and Juvenile Perch and Roach , 1995 .

[8]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Jan Lindström,et al.  Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[11]  A Cockburn,et al.  Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). , 2013, Ecology letters.

[12]  K. Oers,et al.  Personality differences explain leadership in barnacle geese , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective States, Multistability and Transitional Behavior in Schooling Fish , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  J. Krause,et al.  The role of individuality in collective group movement , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[16]  Sue Boinski.  Collective Animal Behavior. By David J. T. Sumpter. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $80.00 (hardcover); $39.50 (paper). x + 302 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-691-12963-1 (hc); 978-0-691-14843-4 (pb). 2010. , 2011 .

[17]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Jens Krause,et al.  Correlates of boldness in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Evolution of personality differences in leadership , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[21]  J. Herbert-Read,et al.  Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Individuals that are consistent in risk-taking benefit during collective foraging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[23]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Evolutionary and ecological approaches to the study of personality , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Orr Spiegel,et al.  What's your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[25]  D. Sumpter.  Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[26]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[27]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Susan E. Riechert,et al.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  F. Q. Ribeiro.  The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[31]  I. Couzin,et al.  Individual variation in local interaction rules can explain emergent patterns of spatial organization in wild baboons , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  A. Manica,et al.  Recent social conditions affect boldness repeatability in individual sticklebacks , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Jens Krause,et al.  Repeated measures of shoaling tendency in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and other small teleost fishes , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[34]  Jens Krause,et al.  Why personality differences matter for social functioning and social structure. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Speed Determines Leadership and Leadership Determines Learning during Pigeon Flocking , 2015, Current Biology.

[36]  A. Ward,et al.  Personality and social context , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  The role of social attraction and its link with boldness in the collective movements of three-spined sticklebacks , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  P. Biro.  Do rapid assays predict repeatability in labile (behavioural) traits? , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  A. Ward,et al.  Sociality: The Behaviour of Group-Living Animals , 2016, Springer International Publishing.

[41]  A. Manica,et al.  Food intake rates of inactive fish are positively linked to boldness in three‐spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus , 2016, Journal of fish biology.

[42]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Identifying differences in the rules of interaction between individuals in moving animal groups , 2016, 1601.08202.

[43]  K. Laland,et al.  Evaluation of a non-invasive tagging system for laboratory studies using three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[44]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[45]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition , 2015, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[46]  J. Krause,et al.  Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy , 2009 .

[47]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.