Analysis of time-domain characteristics in step response of non-minimum phase linear systems

In this paper, step response of non-minimum phase linear systems is studied for presence of unique time-domain characteristics directly linked to non-minimum phase and indirectly to minimum phase systems. The identification of the presence of these characteristics is done using theorems employing transfer function model only. The utility of these theorems is illustrated using the step response of a Real-Time experimental hardware setup. Besides identification, to compare the magnitude of initial undershoot, discussion on a short analysis is done. Furthermore, a practical non-minimum phase system (DC-DC Boost converter) is analyzed for detection of these effects in its step response, as well as comments on the effect of different circuit on the magnitude of initial undershoot of step response are made.

[1]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  Nonminimum Phase Compensation in VSC-HVDC Systems for Fast Direct Voltage Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  On the zeros, initial undershoot, and relative degree of collinear lumped-parameter structures , 2007 .

[3]  Nibedita Swain,et al.  Closed loop control of solar powered boost converter with PID controller , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES).

[4]  Jesse B. Hoagg,et al.  Nonminimum-phase zeros - much to do about nothing - classical control - revisited part II , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[5]  Edward J. Davison,et al.  Performance limitations of non-minimum phase systems in the servomechanism problem, , 1993, Autom..

[6]  Yogesh V. Hote,et al.  Analysis of adverse effects due to zeros in non-minimum phase discrete-time linear systems , 2017, 2017 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON).

[7]  Katsuhiko Ogata,et al.  Modern Control Engineering , 1970 .

[8]  M. Hoagland,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION , 2015 .

[9]  Afshin Izadian,et al.  A new SEPIC inverter: Small signal modeling , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[10]  Khashayar Khorasani,et al.  A neural-network-based controller for a single-link flexible manipulator using the inverse dynamics approach , 2001, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[11]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Drum-boiler dynamics , 2000, Autom..

[12]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Arom Boekfah.  Nonlinear output-transition control for nonminimum-phase systems: The VTOL example , 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering (ICCRE).

[14]  L.Y. Pao,et al.  The effect of nonminimum-phase zero locations on the performance of feedforward model-inverse control techniques in discrete-time systems , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[15]  Yogesh V. Hote,et al.  Analysis of Practical Non-minimum Phase Systems by Transfer Function Approach , 2018, 2018 4th International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES).

[16]  Tobias Damm,et al.  Zero Crossings, Overshoot and Initial Undershoot in the Step and Impulse Responses of Linear Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Yogesh V. Hote,et al.  Relative Stability Analysis of Perturbed Cart Inverted Pendulum: An Experimental Approach , 2018 .