Recent developments in semiotics, semantics, and linguistics tend to give concepts like "schema," "gestalt," and the like a renaissance in the description of signification processes. The actual cognitive semantics tradition (Lakoff, Johnson, Turner, Fauconnier, etc.), for instance, highlights the central role of schemata and their mappings between conceptual and mental spaces in the description of many levels in linguistics. Another related development is the renewed interest in diagrammatic calculi in computer science and AI communities, documented in e.g. the influential Diagrammatic Reasoning volume (Glasgow 1995) - where the diagram category is most often taken for its common sense value as an opposition to the symbol category; little effort is spent on determining the general status of the diagram as such.
[1]
Jon Barwise,et al.
Logical reasoning with diagrams
,
1996
.
[2]
K. Parker.
The Continuity of Peirce's Thought
,
1998
.
[3]
Georg Kreisel,et al.
HILBERT'S PROGRAMME
,
1958
.
[4]
Umberto Eco,et al.
Kant and the Platypus
,
1999
.
[5]
Sun-Joo Shin,et al.
The logical status of diagrams
,
1995
.
[6]
Jon Barwise,et al.
Heterogeneous logic
,
1996
.
[7]
Aaron Sloman,et al.
Musings on the roles of logical and non-logical representations in intelligence
,
1995
.
[8]
Michael May.
Diagrammatisches Denken: Zur Deutung logischer Diagramme als Vorstellungsschemata bei Lakoff und Peirce
,
1995
.
[9]
J. Hintikka.
The Place of C.S. Peirce in the History of Logical Theory
,
1997
.