A Bayesian model of metapopulation viability, with application to an endangered amphibian

Aim Population viability analysis (PVA) is used to quantify the risks faced by species under alternative management regimes. Bayesian PVAs allow uncertainty in the parameters of the underlying population model to be easily propagated through to the predictions. We developed a Bayesian stochastic patch occupancy model (SPOM) and used this model to assess the viability of a metapopulation of the growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) under different urbanization scenarios. Location Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Methods We fitted a Bayesian model that accounted for imperfect detection to a multiseason occupancy dataset for L. raniformis collected across northern Melbourne. The probability of extinction was modelled as a function of effective wetland area, aquatic vegetation cover and connectivity, using logistic regression. The probability of colonization was modelled as a function of connectivity alone. We then simulated the dynamics of a metapopulation of L. raniformis subject to differing levels of urbanization and compensatory wetland creation. Uncertainty was propagated by conducting simulations for 5000 estimates of the parameters of the models for extinction and colonization. Results There was considerable uncertainty in both the probability of quasi-extinction and the minimum number of occupied wetlands under most urbanization scenarios. Uncertainty around the change in quasi-extinction risk and minimum metapopulation size increased with increasing habitat loss. For our focal metapopulation, the analysis revealed that significant investment in new wetlands may be required to offset the impacts of urbanization. Main conclusions Bayesian approaches to PVA allow parametric uncertainty to be propagated and considered in management decisions. They also provide means of identifying parameters that represent critical uncertainties, and, through the use of informative priors, can easily assimilate new data to reduce parametric uncertainty. These advantages, and the ready availability of software to run Bayesian analyses, will ensure that Bayesian approaches are used increasingly for PVAs.

[1]  Philip J. Harrison,et al.  Bayesian state‐space modeling of metapopulation dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly , 2011 .

[2]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF METAPOPULATION DATA , 2002 .

[3]  Michael C. Runge,et al.  An Introduction to Adaptive Management for Threatened and Endangered Species , 2011 .

[4]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis , 2008 .

[5]  F. Huettmann "Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis" by W. F. Morris and D. F. Doak. 2002. [book review] , 2003 .

[6]  E. Fleishman,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the area and isolation paradigm of metapopulation dynamics , 2007 .

[7]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Assessing the Roles of Patch Quality, Area, and Isolation in Predicting Metapopulation Dynamics , 2002 .

[8]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application , 2002 .

[9]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Decision theory for population viability analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[11]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Single‐species dynamic site selection , 2002 .

[12]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality , 1995 .

[13]  S. Wassens,et al.  Habitat characteristics predict occupancy patterns of the endangered amphibian Litoria raniformis in flow-regulated flood plain wetlands. , 2010 .

[14]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Combining Population Viability Analysis with Decision Analysis , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Reliability of Relative Predictions in Population Viability Analysis , 2003 .

[16]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Review of the Generic Computer Programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for Modelling the Viability of Wildlife Metapopulations , 1995 .

[17]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability , 1995 .

[18]  M. Scroggie,et al.  The life history and decline of the threatened Australian frog, Litoria raniformis , 2012 .

[19]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[20]  A. Hamer,et al.  Aspects of the ecology and conservation of the Growling Grass Frog Litoria raniformis in an urban-fringe environment, southern Victoria , 2008 .

[21]  Geoffrey W. Heard,et al.  Classical metapopulation theory as a useful paradigm for the conservation of an endangered amphibian , 2012 .

[22]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Resource allocation for efficient environmental management. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[23]  Perry De Valpine,et al.  A robust-design formulation of the incidence function model of metapopulation dynamics applied to two species of rails. , 2011, Ecology.

[24]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[25]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Testing the focal species approach to making conservation decisions for species persistence , 2013 .

[26]  I. Hanski Metapopulation of animals in highly fragmented landscapes and population viability analysis , 2002 .

[27]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[28]  Karin Frank,et al.  RANKING METAPOPULATION EXTINCTION RISK: FROM PATTERNS IN DATA TO CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT DECISIONS , 2003 .

[29]  B. Wintle,et al.  State-and-transition modelling for Adaptive Management of native woodlands , 2011 .

[30]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Assessing human impact despite uncertainty:viability of the northern spotted owl metapopulation in the northwestern USA , 1998, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[31]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations , 2003 .

[32]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Ranking Conservation and Timber Management Options for Leadbeater's Possum in Southeastern Australia Using Population Viability Analysis , 1996 .

[33]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[34]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty and the Assessment of Extinction Probabilities , 1996 .

[35]  M. Scroggie,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of the endangered Growling Grass Frog * Litoria raniformis in southern Victoria , 2008 .

[36]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. , 2007, Ecology.

[37]  Michael A. Larson,et al.  Incorporating parametric uncertainty into population viability analysis models , 2011 .

[38]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Difficulties in deducing dynamics from static distributions. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology , 1997 .

[40]  John M. Drake,et al.  Population Viability Analysis , 2019, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[41]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[42]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[43]  N. Yoccoz Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence , 2006 .

[44]  M. Burgman Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[45]  J. Craig Viable populations for conservation , 1990 .

[46]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[47]  A. Jansen Bayesian Methods for Ecology , 2009 .

[48]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[49]  G. Pyke A review of the biology of the Southern Bell Frog Litoria raniformis (Anura: Hylidae) , 2002 .

[50]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical modeling of an invasive spread: the Eurasian Collared-Dove Streptopelia decaocto in the United States. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology: The Analysis of Data from Populations, Metapopulations and Communities , 2008 .

[52]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[53]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  IMPROVED BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF METAPOPULATION DATA WITH AN APPLICATION TO A TREE FROG METAPOPULATION , 2003 .

[54]  Colin J. Thompson,et al.  Expected minimum population size as a measure of threat , 2001 .

[55]  Cindy E Hauser,et al.  Economic aspects of post‐border weed risk management , 2013 .