Illusory scene distortion occurs during perceived self-rotation in roll

We report a novel illusory distortion of the visual scene, which became apparent during both: (i) observer rotation inside a furnished stationary room; and (ii) room rotation about the stationary observer. While this distortion had several manifestations, the most common experience was that scenery near fixation appeared to sometimes lead and other times lag more peripheral scenery. Across a series of experiments, we eliminated explanations based on eye-movements, distance misperception, peripheral aliasing, differential motion sensitivity and adaptation. We found that these illusory scene distortions occurred only when the observer perceived (real or illusory) changes in self-tilt and maintained a stable fixation.

[1]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  The Direct versus Inferential controversy revisited , 2000 .

[2]  Willem Bles,et al.  Angular velocity, not temporal frequency determines circular vection , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  K. E. Money,et al.  Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J Dichgans,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction and motion perception. , 1972, Bibliotheca ophthalmologica : supplementa ad ophthalmologica.

[5]  I. Howard,et al.  Circularvection about earth-horizontal axes in bilateral labyrinthine-defective subjects. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Dynamics of torsional optokinetic nystagmus under altered gravitoinertial forces , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  L R Young,et al.  Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation. , 1990, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  R Held,et al.  State reversals of optically induced tilt and torsional eye movements , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Torsional eye movements are facilitated during perception of self-motion , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Large receptive fields for optic flow detection in humans , 1998, Vision Research.

[12]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception , 1972 .

[13]  H Fushiki,et al.  Influence of fixation on circular vection. , 2000, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[14]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Properties of early motion processing: Implications for the sensing of ego motion , 1990 .

[16]  I. Howard,et al.  Visually Induced Reorientation Illusions , 2001, Perception.

[17]  L R Young,et al.  Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation. , 1975, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Perception & control of self-motion , 1991 .

[19]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[20]  M. J. Wright,et al.  Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision , 1986, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of the Relative Sizes, Distances, and Positions of Two Competing Visual Displays , 1989, Perception.

[23]  I P Howard,et al.  Visually-induced reorientation illusions as a function of age. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  I. Howard,et al.  Effect of Field Size, Head Motion, and Rotational Velocity on Roll Vection and Illusory Self-Tilt in a Tumbling Room , 1999, Perception.

[25]  T. Brandt,et al.  Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: Psychophysics of a new phenomenon , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Reinhart Jürgens,et al.  Circular vection during voluntary suppression of optokinetic reflex , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Ernst Mach,et al.  Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen , 1967 .

[28]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Ensemble Models of the Movement Aftereffect and the Influence of Eccentricity , 1994, Perception.

[30]  B Gillam,et al.  Stimulus Eccentricity and Spatial Frequency Interact to Determine Circular Vection , 1998, Perception.

[31]  B. Graaf,et al.  The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: Adjacency is not a factor contributing to the filehne illusion , 1988, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Optokinetic motion sickness and pseudo-Coriolis effects induced by moving visual stimuli. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[33]  Claudine Habak,et al.  Central and peripheral interactions in the perception of optic flow , 2002, Vision Research.

[34]  J Dichgans,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction upon nystagmus slow phase velocity in man. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[35]  F. Newell.  Cerebral Control of Eye Movements and Motion Perception , 1973 .

[36]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[37]  Ian P Howard,et al.  The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.

[38]  S. S. Stevens.  On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[39]  E. Wist,et al.  Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation , 1975 .

[40]  R. Held,et al.  Moving Visual Scenes Influence the Apparent Direction of Gravity , 1972, Science.

[41]  I. Howard,et al.  Vection: The Contributions of Absolute and Relative Visual Motion , 1994, Perception.

[42]  I. P. Howard,et al.  Optokinetic torsion: Dynamics and relation to circularvection , 1991, Vision Research.