Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community

Drinking water quality in the United States (US) is among the safest in the world. However, many residents, often in rural areas, rely on unregulated private wells or small municipal utilities for water needs. These utilities may violate the Safe Drinking Water Act contaminant guidelines, often because they lack the required financial resources. Residents may use alternative water sources or install a home water treatment system. Despite increased home water treatment adoption, few studies have examined their use and effectiveness in the US. Our study addresses this knowledge gap by examining home water treatment in a rural Arizona community. Water samples were analyzed for metal(loid)s, and home treatment and demographic data were recorded in 31 homes. Approximately 42% of homes treated their water. Independent of source water quality, residents with higher income (OR = 1.25; 95%CI (1.00 – 1.64)) and education levels (OR = 1.49; 95%CI (1.12 – 2.12)) were more likely to treat their water. Some contaminant concentrations were effectively reduced with treatment, while some were not. We conclude that increased educational outreach on contaminant testing and treatment, especially to rural areas with endemic water contamination, would result in a greater public health impact while reducing rural health disparities.

[1]  G. Ozolins,et al.  WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. , 1984, WHO chronicle.

[2]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[3]  Habibul Ahsan,et al.  The Broad Scope of Health Effects from Chronic Arsenic Exposure: Update on a Worldwide Public Health Problem , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  L. Pratson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Arsenic Remediation from Groundwater in a Private Home , 2010 .

[5]  Edward J. Calabrese,et al.  Safe Drinking Water Act , 1989 .

[6]  P. Mccarty,et al.  Chemistry for environmental engineering , 1978 .

[7]  A. Smith,et al.  Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water: recent human findings. , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[8]  J. P. van der Hoek,et al.  Drinking water treatment technologies in Europe: state of the art, challenges, research needs , 2014 .

[9]  Sara V. Flanagan,et al.  Influences on domestic well water testing behavior in a Central Maine area with frequent groundwater arsenic occurrence. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Arsenic in drinking water: A worldwide water quality concern for water supply companies , 2009 .

[11]  R. Cartwright.  Calcium and Magnesium in Drinking-Water: Public Health Significance , 2010 .

[12]  Method 8276: Toxaphene and Toxaphene Congeners By Gas Chromatography/Negative Ion Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry (GC-NICI/MS), part of Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods , 2022 .

[13]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Home gardening near a mining site in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona: assessing arsenic exposure dose and risk via ingestion of home garden vegetables, soils, and water. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Sara V. Flanagan,et al.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  L. Merritt.  Water Quality: An Introduction , 1977 .

[16]  M. Walker,et al.  Treating and Drinking Well Water in the Presence of Health Risks from Arsenic Contamination: Results from a U.S. Hot Spot , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  P. Sengupta.  Potential Health Impacts of Hard Water , 2013, International journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  W. Rogan,et al.  Drinking Water From Private Wells and Risks to Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[19]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Arsenic removal by RO and NF membranes , 1997 .

[20]  J. Broekaert,et al.  Determination of arsenic and selenium species in groundwater and soil extracts by ion chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 2001 .

[21]  Yan Zheng,et al.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  F. Kožíšek.  Health significance of drinking water calcium and magnesium , 2012 .

[23]  C. Gerba,et al.  Risk of Waterborne Illness Via Drinking Water in the United States , 2008, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[24]  M. P. Thomas,et al.  Calcium and Magnesium in Drinking‐water: Public Health Significance , 2010 .

[25]  Charles Reese,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , 2017 .

[26]  A. Hubbard,et al.  Environmental justice implications of arsenic contamination in California’s San Joaquin Valley: a cross-sectional, cluster-design examining exposure and compliance in community drinking water systems , 2012, Environmental Health.

[27]  Dolores J Severtson,et al.  Applying a Health Behavior Theory to Explore the Influence of Information and Experience on Arsenic Risk Representations, Policy Beliefs, and Protective Behavior , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  D. Levy,et al.  A cross-sectional study of well water arsenic and child IQ in Maine schoolchildren , 2014, Environmental Health.

[29]  Ori Lahav,et al.  Quality criteria for desalinated water following post-treatment , 2007 .

[30]  C. Steinmaus,et al.  Reverse Osmosis Filter Use and High Arsenic Levels in Private Well Water , 2006, Archives of environmental & occupational health.

[31]  R. Hornung,et al.  Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .

[32]  J. Froines,et al.  UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , 1995 .

[33]  Ernest O. Kartinen,et al.  An overview of arsenic removal processes , 1995 .