Potential strategies for increasing drug-discovery productivity.

The productivity challenge facing the pharmaceutical industry is well documented. Strategies to improve productivity have mainly focused on enhancing efficiency, such as the application of Lean Six Sigma process improvement methods and the introduction of modeling and simulation in place of 'wet' experiments. While these strategies have their benefits, the real challenge is to improve effectiveness by reducing clinical failure rates. We advocate redesigning the screening cascade to identify and optimize novel compounds with improved efficacy against disease, not just with improved potency against the target. There should be greater use of disease-relevant phenotypic screens in conjunction with target-based assays to drive medicinal chemistry optimization. An opportunistic approach to polypharmacology is recommended. There should also be more emphasis on optimization of the molecular mechanism of action incorporating understanding of binding kinetics, consideration of covalent drug strategies and targeting allosteric modulators.

[1]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. , 2010, Blood.

[2]  D. Swinney,et al.  How were new medicines discovered? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  J. Patterson,et al.  3-Carboxy-5-methyl-N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-isoxazolecarboxamide, a new prodrug for the antiarthritic agent 2-cyano-3-hydroxy-N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2-butenamide. , 1992, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Roman Boutellier,et al.  A case study of lean drug discovery: from project driven research to innovation studios and process factories. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[5]  Weiying Yang,et al.  Discovery of (1R,5S)-N-[3-amino-1-(cyclobutylmethyl)-2,3-dioxopropyl]- 3-[2(S)-[[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutyl]- 6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-2(S)-carboxamide (SCH 503034), a selective, potent, orally bioavailable hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor: , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  R. Solé,et al.  The topology of drug-target interaction networks: implicit dependence on drug properties and target families. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[7]  Clay W Scott,et al.  Label-free whole-cell assays: expanding the scope of GPCR screening. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[8]  M. Lindsay Finding new drug targets in the 21st century. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[9]  John P. Overington,et al.  Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  D. Sutherlin,et al.  Second generation 2-pyridyl biphenyl amide inhibitors of the hedgehog pathway. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[11]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[12]  Garry Pairaudeau,et al.  Creativity, innovation and lean sigma: a controversial combination? , 2011, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  Discovery and Preclinical Validation of Drug Indications Using Compendia of Public Gene Expression Data , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  M. Mammen,et al.  THRX-198321 Is a Bifunctional Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist and β2-Adrenoceptor Agonist (MABA) That Binds in a Bimodal and Multivalent Manner , 2011, Molecular Pharmacology.

[15]  A. Mantovani,et al.  Allosteric inhibitors of chemoattractant receptors: opportunities and pitfalls. , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[16]  S. Muresan,et al.  Chemical predictive modelling to improve compound quality , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  R. Morphy,et al.  Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  F. Sams-Dodd,et al.  Is poor research the cause of the declining productivity of the pharmaceutical industry? An industry in need of a paradigm shift. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[19]  F. Pammolli,et al.  The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  M. Rowlands,et al.  Novel steroidal inhibitors of human cytochrome P45017 alpha (17 alpha-hydroxylase-C17,20-lyase): potential agents for the treatment of prostatic cancer. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  P. Tonge,et al.  Drug-target residence time: critical information for lead optimization. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[22]  Ariana Peck,et al.  Mechanism of MEK inhibition determines efficacy in mutant KRAS- versus BRAF-driven cancers , 2013, Nature.

[23]  R. Copeland,et al.  Drug–target residence time and its implications for lead optimization , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  D. Muñoz-Torrero,et al.  Human disease and drug pharmacology, complex as real life. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[25]  P. Clemons,et al.  Target identification and mechanism of action in chemical biology and drug discovery. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[26]  Steve Price Putative allosteric MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors , 2008 .

[27]  F. Khanim,et al.  PEP005, a selective small-molecule activator of protein kinase C, has potent antileukemic activity mediated via the delta isoform of PKC. , 2005, Blood.

[28]  F. Sams-Dodd,et al.  Strategies to optimize the validity of disease models in the drug discovery process. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[29]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Emerging paradigms in GPCR allostery: implications for drug discovery , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[30]  D. Sall,et al.  Modern phenotypic drug discovery is a viable, neoclassic pharma strategy. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Nidhal Selmi,et al.  Making medicinal chemistry more effective--application of Lean Sigma to improve processes, speed and quality. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[32]  P. Dorr,et al.  Molecular cloning and radioligand binding characterization of the chemokine receptor CCR5 from rhesus macaque and human. , 2005, Biochemical pharmacology.

[33]  Hinrich W. H. Göhlmann,et al.  A Diarylquinoline Drug Active on the ATP Synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2005, Science.

[34]  Brian M. Smith,et al.  Discovery and SAR of new benzazepines as potent and selective 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity. , 2005, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[35]  R. Iyengar,et al.  Systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery. , 2010, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[36]  F. Sams-Dodd Target-based drug discovery: is something wrong? , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[37]  T. Kenakin,et al.  The CCR5 Receptor-Based Mechanism of Action of 873140, a Potent Allosteric Noncompetitive HIV Entry Inhibitor , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[38]  Sarah L. Kinnings,et al.  Novel computational approaches to polypharmacology as a means to define responses to individual drugs. , 2012, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[39]  Richard Morphy,et al.  The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  H. Jamil,et al.  A novel series of highly potent benzimidazole-based microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  P. Gokhale,et al.  Discovery of novel insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitors with unique time-dependent binding kinetics. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[42]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Rational approaches to targeted polypharmacology: creating and navigating protein-ligand interaction networks. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[43]  C. Johnstone Medicinal chemistry matters - a call for discipline in our discipline. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[44]  P. Bamborough,et al.  Discovery and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the BET family bromodomains. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  Jinglan Zhou,et al.  Rescue of CF airway epithelial cell function in vitro by a CFTR potentiator, VX-770 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Adrian Whitty,et al.  The resurgence of covalent drugs , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[47]  S. Wilhelm,et al.  Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[48]  D. Swinney,et al.  Biochemical Mechanisms of New Molecular Entities (NMEs) approved by United States FDA during 2001‐2004: Mechanisms leading to optimal efficacy and safety. , 2006, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[49]  T. Hanada,et al.  Discovery of 2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)benzonitrile (perampanel): a novel, noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropanoic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[50]  A. Hatzelmann,et al.  Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Potential of the Novel PDE 4 Inhibitor Roflumilast in Vitro , 2001 .

[51]  Richard Morphy,et al.  Designing multiple ligands - medicinal chemistry strategies and challenges. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical design.

[52]  J. Widdicombe,et al.  A novel extract SB-300 from the stem bark latex of Croton lechleri inhibits CFTR-mediated chloride secretion in human colonic epithelial cells. , 2004, Journal of ethnopharmacology.

[53]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[54]  J. Medina-Franco,et al.  Shifting from the single to the multitarget paradigm in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[55]  Yongchang Shi,et al.  Cabozantinib (XL184), a Novel MET and VEGFR2 Inhibitor, Simultaneously Suppresses Metastasis, Angiogenesis, and Tumor Growth , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[56]  I. Khanna,et al.  Drug discovery in pharmaceutical industry: productivity challenges and trends. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[57]  R. Morphy Selectively nonselective kinase inhibition: striking the right balance. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[58]  K. Onda,et al.  Synthesis and evaluation of novel phenylethanolamine derivatives containing acetanilides as potent and selective beta3-adrenergic receptor agonists. , 2010, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[59]  A. Plowright,et al.  What is the most important approach in current drug discovery: doing the right things or doing things right? , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[60]  Jianfeng Pei,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the influence of drug binding kinetics on drug action at molecular and systems levels. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[61]  P. Hirth,et al.  Vemurafenib: the first drug approved for BRAF-mutant cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[62]  Pekka Tiikkainen,et al.  Computational tools for polypharmacology and repurposing. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[63]  David E. Leahy,et al.  Drug discovery information integration: virtual humans for pharmacokinetics , 2004 .

[64]  David Brown,et al.  Unfinished business: target-based drug discovery. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[65]  F. Sams-Dodd,et al.  Drug discovery: selecting the optimal approach. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[66]  E. Trinquet,et al.  Monitoring Gq-coupled receptor response through inositol phosphate quantification with the IP-One assay , 2011, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[67]  C. Hart,et al.  Finding the target after screening the phenotype. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[68]  M. Currie,et al.  Linaclotide, through activation of guanylate cyclase C, acts locally in the gastrointestinal tract to elicit enhanced intestinal secretion and transit. , 2010, European journal of pharmacology.

[69]  Michael J. Keiser,et al.  Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs , 2009, Nature.

[70]  J. Scannell,et al.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[71]  W. König,et al.  Hoe 140 a new potent and long acting bradykinin‐antagonist: in vivo studies , 1991, British journal of pharmacology.

[72]  Herbert Waldmann,et al.  Target identification for small bioactive molecules: finding the needle in the haystack. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[73]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[74]  D. Marin,et al.  Phase I/II trial of adding semisynthetic homoharringtonine in chronic myeloid leukemia patients who have achieved partial or complete cytogenetic response on imatinib , 2005, Cancer.

[75]  C. Klein,et al.  Target Binding Properties and Cellular Activity of Afatinib (BIBW 2992), an Irreversible ErbB Family Blocker , 2012, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[76]  S. Ou Crizotinib: a novel and first-in-class multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and beyond , 2011, Drug design, development and therapy.

[77]  Nichola L. Davies,et al.  Investigation of the effect of molecular properties on the binding kinetics of a ligand to its biological target , 2012 .

[78]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[79]  S. Frantz Drug discovery: Playing dirty , 2005, Nature.

[80]  K. Breithaupt-Grögler,et al.  Comparative Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan and Losartan in Man , 2000, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[81]  R. A. Thompson,et al.  Hypothesis driven drug design: improving quality and effectiveness of the design-make-test-analyse cycle. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[82]  Robert R Ruffolo,et al.  Why has R&D productivity declined in the pharmaceutical industry? , 2006, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[83]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Irreversible inhibitors of the EGF receptor may circumvent acquired resistance to gefitinib. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  Jerry L. Adams,et al.  A protein kinase involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine biosynthesis , 1994, Nature.

[85]  Paul Morgan,et al.  Can the flow of medicines be improved? Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacological principles toward improving Phase II survival. , 2012, Drug discovery today.