Reviewing the effectiveness of electronic vehicle immobilisation: Evidence from four countries

This article reviews the evidence from 16 studies that have examined the impact of electronic immobilisation on vehicle theft in the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia and the USA. Six hypotheses that explore how electronic immobilisers work were examined. The results show that 15 of the 16 studies indicate that electronic immobilisation has been successful in reducing vehicle theft. These reductions have mostly been larger for temporary (recovered) vehicle thefts than for permanent (unrecovered) thefts. This may also have resulted in a reduction in young people engaging in vehicle theft. Although some studies showed there had been displacement towards vehicles without electronic immobilisation, this was outweighed by the reductions in vehicle theft observed overall.

[1]  S. Kriven,et al.  New Car Security and Shifting Vehicle Theft Patterns in Australia , 2007 .

[2]  Jörg Bässmann.  Vehicle Theft Reduction in Germany: The Long-Term Effectiveness of Electronic Immobilisation , 2011 .

[3]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The International Crime Drop , 2012 .

[4]  Paul Ekblom,et al.  Gearing Up Against Crime: a Dynamic Framework to Help Designers Keep up with the Adaptive Criminal in a Changing World , 1997 .

[5]  Nick Tilley,et al.  The Crime Drop and the Security Hypothesis , 2011 .

[6]  R. Manchin,et al.  The burden of crime in the EU : A comparative analysis of the European Survey of Crime and Safety (EU ICS 2005) , 2007 .

[7]  Gk Laycock.  The UK Car Theft Index: An Example of Government Leverage , 2004 .

[8]  Heith Copes,et al.  THE KEY TO AUTO THEFT: Emerging Methods of Auto Theft from the Offenders' Perspective , 2006 .

[9]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The effectiveness of vehicle security devices and their role in the crime drop , 2011 .

[10]  M. Maxfield,et al.  Security and the Drop in Car Theft in the United States , 2012 .

[11]  Rick Brown,et al.  Aging Vehicles: Evidence of the Effectiveness of New Car Security from the Home Office Car Theft Index , 2003 .

[12]  P. Ekblom.  The private sector and designing products against crime , 2012 .

[13]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. , 2006 .

[14]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Business and Crime Prevention , 1997 .

[15]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  UNDERSTANDING AND PREVENTING CAR THEFT , 2004 .

[16]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention , 2012 .

[17]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[18]  N. Tilley.  Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety , 2017 .

[19]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The international crime drop : new directions in research , 2012 .

[20]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Research in Brief. National Institute of Justice. , 1998 .

[21]  Barry Webb,et al.  STEERING COLUMN LOCKS AND MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT: EVALUATIONS FROM THREE COUNTRIES , 2006 .

[22]  Harry Wilkin Perry.  Anti Joy Ride Devices , 1910 .

[23]  Stephen Mason.  Vehicle remote keyless entry systems and engine immobilisers: Do not believe the insurer that this technology is perfect , 2012, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[24]  R. Clarke.  Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[25]  G Laycock,et al.  Designing Out Crime Through Vehicle Licensing and Registration Systems , 2004 .