Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking Organizational Safety Culture in Construction

This paper promotes adopting the balanced scorecard tool to benchmark organizational safety culture in construction. It argues that this tool has the potential to provide a medium to translate the organization’s safety policy into a clear set of goals across four perspectives: \Imanagement, operational, customer, and learning.\N These goals are then further translated into a system of performance measures that could effectively communicate a powerful strategic focus on safety to the entire organization. Four perspectives have been developed to represent all stakeholders, thereby ensuring that a holistic view of safety is used for strategic reflection and implementation. The paper argues that by selecting and evaluating the appropriate measures, in each perspective, requirements can be identified, and actions to the identified goals can be aligned and facilitated. The proposed balanced scorecard approach should therefore enable construction organizations to pursue incremental safety performance improvements. Work-in-progress is briefly reported to give insight into the potential applicability of this approach.

[1]  William Eugene Tarrants,et al.  The measurement of safety performance , 1980 .

[2]  Nabil Kartam,et al.  Integrating Safety and Health Performance into Construction CPM , 1997 .

[3]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Empirical investigation of construction safety management activities and performance in Australia , 1999 .

[4]  A. Glendon,et al.  Perspectives on safety culture , 2000 .

[5]  K Ojanen,et al.  Measurement methodology for the effects of accident prevention programs. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[6]  R. A. Phillips,et al.  Reducing accidents using goal setting and feedback: A field study , 1994 .

[7]  A. Glendon,et al.  Human Safety and Risk Management, Second Edition , 2006 .

[8]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[9]  Stuart D. Anderson,et al.  Strategies for Achieving Excellence in Construction Safety Performance , 1996 .

[10]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[11]  H Laitinen,et al.  The validity of the TR safety observation method on building construction. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Rob Buchan,et al.  Safety can't wait : A global campaign for transformational change , 1999 .

[13]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  Safety behaviour and safety management: its influence on the attitudes of workers in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[14]  Tony Baxendale,et al.  Construction design and management safety regulations in practice—progress on implementation , 2000 .

[15]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[16]  L.W.D. Cullen,et al.  The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster , 1993 .

[17]  M. D. Cooper.  Towards a model of safety culture , 2000 .

[18]  G. Johnson.  Managing strategic change--strategy, culture and action. , 1992, Long range planning.

[19]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[20]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Using benchmarking to facilitate strategic IT implementation in construction organisations , 2001 .

[21]  Carol J. McNair,et al.  Benchmarking : A Tool for Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[22]  C. Fuller.  Key performance indicators for benchmarking health and safety management in intra‐ and inter‐company comparisons , 1997 .

[23]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Role of designers in construction worker safety , 1992 .

[24]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[25]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Experience Modification Rating As Measure of Safety Performance , 1995 .

[26]  J. Komaki,et al.  Leadership from an Operant Perspective , 1998 .