Bureaucratic Capacity and Bureaucratic Discretion

This article assesses whether the managerial capacity of agencies influences the volume of policy authority that lawmakers delegate. Examining a sample of agencies whose managerial capacities were assessed along the same criteria, and allowing for the comparison of performance across agencies, we observe that poorly performing agencies are more likely to lose policy authority. Our findings suggest that lawmakers promote effective policymaking by giving agencies the incentive to perform well and that models of discretion that do not account for performance underestimate the effect of another factor—policy conflict between the legislative and executive branches—on how much discretion agencies receive.

[1]  D. Koretz Measuring Up , 2008 .

[2]  Craig W. Thomas Government Performance: Why Management Matters , 2006 .

[3]  D. Lewis Staffing Alone: Unilateral Action and the Politicization of the Executive Office of the President, 1988‐2004 , 2005 .

[4]  Michael Nelson,et al.  Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946-1997 (review) , 2005, Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

[5]  Daniel Carpenter,et al.  Political Learning from Rare Events: Poisson Inference, Fiscal Constraints, and the Lifetime of Bureaus , 2004, Political Analysis.

[6]  Francesco Giovannoni,et al.  Deliberate Discretion?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. , 2004 .

[7]  J. Bohte,et al.  Political Transaction Costs and the Politics of Administrative Design , 2004, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  E. Ringquist,et al.  Salience, Complexity, and the Legislative Direction of Regulatory Bureaucracies , 2003 .

[9]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results , 2003 .

[10]  James J. Connolly Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884-1936 . By Scott C. James ( New York , Cambridge University Press , 2000 ) 307 pp. $59.95 , 2001, Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

[11]  Scott C. James Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884-1936 , 2000 .

[12]  Matthew Potoski Managing Uncertainty through Bureaucratic Design: Administrative Procedures and State Air Pollution Control Agencies , 1999 .

[13]  Kathleen Bawn Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices about Administrative Procedures , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control , 1987 .

[15]  W. Gormley Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System , 1986, Polity.

[16]  Thomas Schwartz,et al.  Congressional Oversight Over-looked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms , 1984 .

[17]  K. Esterling The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics , 2004 .

[18]  C. Volden Erratum: A Formal Model of the Politics of Delegation in a Separation of Powers System , 2002 .

[19]  Daniel Carpenter,et al.  The forging of bureaucratic autonomy : reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928 , 2001 .

[20]  John D. Huber,et al.  Legislatures and statutory control of bureaucracy , 2001 .

[21]  D. Carpenter “Stochastic Prediction and Estimation of Nonlinear Political Durations: An Application to the Lifetime of Bureaus” , 2000 .

[22]  Sharyn O'Halloran,et al.  Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers , 1999 .

[23]  Benjamin I. Page Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy , 1996 .

[24]  R. Arnold The logic of congressional action , 1990 .

[25]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Managing for Results , 1964 .