Editorial "Advances in Earth observation for water cycle science"

Since observing the Earth from space became possible more than forty years ago, satellite Earth Observation (EO) missions have become central to the monitoring and understanding of the Earth system, its different components and how they interact with each other. The continuous growth and improvements in the quality of the data and information provided by satellites has resulted in significant progress and advances in a broad range of scientific and application areas including the understanding and characterisation of the global water cycle hydrology and water management. The water cycle is a complex process driven mainly by solar radiation. The evaporation of water from open water and wet soil surfaces is controlled by energy and water availability and near-surface atmospheric conditions (air temperature, humidity and wind-speed), while transpiration of water is primarily controlled by vegetation. The result of evaporation and transpiration is the presence of water vapour in the atmosphere, a prerequisite for cloud formation. If cloud condensation nuclei are present and if the atmospheric state allows for condensation, clouds are formed which are then globally distributed by winds. In the presence of precipitating clouds, water returns back to the Earth’s surface where it accumulates in rivers, lakes and oceans. Surface water may also infiltrate into the soil, moistening the soil layers and accumulating as groundwater replenishing aquifers. Aquifers can store water for several (thousands of) years, provide water for human activities, or discharge it naturally to the surface or to the oceans. The response of the hydrological cycle to global warming is expected to be far reaching (Bengtsson, 2010), and because different physical processes control the change in water vapour and consequently evaporation and precipitation, a more extreme distribution of precipitation is expected leading to, in general, wet areas become wetter and dry areas become dryer (IPCC, 2008). In this context, relying on accurate and continuous observations of the long-term dynamics of the different key variables governing the energy and water cycle processes from global to local scale is essential to further increase not only our understanding of the different components of the water cycle both in its spatial and temporal variability, but also to characterise the processes and interactions between the terrestrial and atmospheric aspects of the energy and water cycle, and how this coupling may influence climate variability and predictability. Such global and continuous observations can only be secured by the effective use of Earth Observation (EO) satellites as a major complement to in-situ observation networks. In the years to come, EO technology will enter into a new era, where the increasing number of more sophisticated missions will provide scientists with an unprecedented capacity to observe and monitor the different components of the water cycle from the local to the global scales. Already today, global observations of several key parameters governing the global water cycle (e.g. precipitation, soil moisture, water vapor, evaporation and transpiration, water levels, gravityderived groundwater measurements, etc. ...) are feasible. In addition, significant progress has been made in the area of data assimilation enhancing the capabilities to integrate EObased products into suitable land surface and hydrological models; hence opening new opportunities for science and applications.

[1]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data , 2008 .

[2]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Remotely sensed latent heat fluxes for model error diagnosis: a case study , 2011 .

[3]  B. Duchemin,et al.  Combined use of optical and radar satellite data for the monitoring of irrigation and soil moisture of wheat crops , 2011 .

[4]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery , 2010 .

[5]  P. Kosuth,et al.  Estimating river discharge from earth observation measurements of river surface hydraulic variables , 2010 .

[6]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery , 2011 .

[7]  Jeanine Engelbrecht,et al.  Particular uncertainties encountered in using a pre-packaged SEBS model to derive evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous study area in South Africa , 2011 .

[8]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Land surface temperature representativeness in a heterogeneous area through a distributed energy-water balance model and remote sensing data. , 2010 .

[9]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  The global atmospheric water cycle , 2010 .

[10]  I. Dharssi,et al.  Operational assimilation of ASCAT surface soil wetness at the Met Office , 2011 .

[11]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .

[12]  V. Levizzani,et al.  Status of satellite precipitation retrievals , 2009 .

[13]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Combined use of FORMOSAT-2 images with a crop model for biomass and water monitoring of permanent grassland in Mediterranean region , 2010 .

[14]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Potential of High-resolution Detection and Retrieval of Precipitation Fields from X-band Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar over land , 2010 .

[15]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes , 1994 .

[16]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Observation of hydrological processes using remote sensing , 2011 .

[17]  Yaoming Ma,et al.  The Tibetan plateau observatory of plateau scale soil moisture and soil temperature, Tibet - Obs, for quantifying uncertainties in coarse resolution satellite and model products , 2011 .

[18]  S. Bastola,et al.  Towards improving river discharge estimation in ungauged basins: calibration of rainfall-runoff models based on satellite observations of river flow width at basin outlet , 2010 .

[19]  T. Holmes,et al.  Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations , 2010 .

[20]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Effective roughness modelling as a tool for soil moisture retrieval from C-and L-band SAR , 2010 .

[21]  R. A. Roebeling,et al.  Evaluation of rainfall retrievals from SEVIRI reflectances over West Africa using TRMM-PR and CMORPH , 2011 .

[22]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  Françoise Gellens-Meulenberghs,et al.  Evapotranspiration modelling at large scale using near-real time MSG SEVIRI derived data , 2010 .

[24]  Frédéric Baup,et al.  Mapping surface soil moisture over the Gourma mesoscale site (Mali) by using ENVISAT ASAR data , 2010 .

[25]  Z. Su,et al.  Remote sensing of soil moisture using EMAC/ESAR data , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[26]  I. S. Bowen The Ratio of Heat Losses by Conduction and by Evaporation from any Water Surface , 1926 .

[27]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Error characterisation of global active and passive microwave soil moisture datasets. , 2010 .

[28]  Y. Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements of the Global Water Cycle This satellite mission will use new algorithms to try to forecast weather and estimate climate change from satellite measurements of the Earth's surface. , 2010 .

[29]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[30]  H. L. Penman Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[31]  Luigi J. Renzullo,et al.  Water resource monitoring systems and the role of satellite observations , 2011 .

[32]  L. Phalippou,et al.  CryoSat: A mission to determine the fluctuations in Earth’s land and marine ice fields ☆ , 2006 .

[33]  Mario Minacapilli,et al.  The impact of in-canopy wind profile formulations on heat flux estimation in an open orchard using the remote sensing-based two-source model , 2010 .

[34]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  Monitoring of water and carbon fluxes using a land data assimilation system: a case study for southwestern France , 2010 .

[35]  W. Wagner,et al.  Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product , 2010 .

[36]  Ralf Bennartz,et al.  Retrieval of columnar water vapour over land from backscattered solar radiation using the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer , 2001 .

[37]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[38]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Interannual variations of the terrestrial water storage in the Lower Ob' Basin from a multisatellite approach , 2009 .

[39]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates , 2011 .