Brain-wide neural dynamics of poststroke recovery induced by optogenetic stimulation

Optogenetic fMRI highlights the involvement of corticothalamic circuit as an early mediator of recovery after stroke. Poststroke optogenetic stimulations can promote functional recovery. However, the circuit mechanisms underlying recovery remain unclear. Elucidating key neural circuits involved in recovery will be invaluable for translating neuromodulation strategies after stroke. Here, we used optogenetic functional magnetic resonance imaging to map brain-wide neural circuit dynamics after stroke in mice treated with and without optogenetic excitatory neuronal stimulations in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (iM1). We identified key sensorimotor circuits affected by stroke. iM1 stimulation treatment restored activation of the ipsilesional corticothalamic and corticocortical circuits, and the extent of activation was correlated with functional recovery. Furthermore, stimulated mice exhibited higher expression of axonal growth–associated protein 43 in the ipsilesional thalamus and showed increased Synaptophysin+/channelrhodopsin+ presynaptic axonal terminals in the corticothalamic circuit. Selective stimulation of the corticothalamic circuit was sufficient to improve functional recovery. Together, these findings suggest early involvement of corticothalamic circuit as an important mediator of poststroke recovery.

[1]  J. Krakauer,et al.  No evidence for motor recovery-related cortical reorganization after stroke using resting-state fMRI , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  Keith C. Cheng,et al.  Enhanced and unified anatomical labeling for a common mouse brain atlas , 2019, Nature Communications.

[3]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Rethinking interhemispheric imbalance as a target for stroke neurorehabilitation , 2019, Annals of neurology.

[4]  K. Blennow,et al.  Transient increase in CSF GAP-43 concentration after ischemic stroke , 2018, BMC Neurology.

[5]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Broken Movement: The Neurobiology of Motor Recovery after Stroke , 2017 .

[6]  B. Ommer,et al.  Optogenetically stimulating intact rat corticospinal tract post-stroke restores motor control through regionalized functional circuit formation , 2017, Nature Communications.

[7]  Kelly A. Tennant,et al.  Optogenetic rewiring of thalamocortical circuits to restore function in the stroke injured brain , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  Michelle Y. Cheng,et al.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus promotes persistent functional recovery after stroke , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Xiaosong He,et al.  Optical inhibition of striatal neurons promotes focal neurogenesis and neurobehavioral recovery in mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  Andrew J. Weitz,et al.  Studying Brain Circuit Function with Dynamic Causal Modeling for Optogenetic fMRI , 2017, Neuron.

[11]  M. Tanter,et al.  Light controls cerebral blood flow in naive animals , 2017, Nature Communications.

[12]  Cornelius Faber,et al.  True and apparent optogenetic BOLD fMRI signals , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Markus Aswendt,et al.  Optogenetic Approaches to Target Specific Neural Circuits in Post-stroke Recovery , 2015, Neurotherapeutics.

[14]  Juliana Y. Rhee,et al.  Acute off-target effects of neural circuit manipulations , 2015, Nature.

[15]  Naoki Yamawaki,et al.  Synaptic Circuit Organization of Motor Corticothalamic Neurons , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Shahabeddin Vahdat,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[17]  T. Murphy,et al.  Optogenetic Mapping after Stroke Reveals Network-Wide Scaling of Functional Connections and Heterogeneous Recovery of the Peri-Infarct , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Timothy H. Murphy,et al.  Stroke and the Connectome: How Connectivity Guides Therapeutic Intervention , 2014, Neuron.

[19]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation promotes functional recovery after stroke , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  José C. Rubio,et al.  Asynchronous therapy restores motor control by rewiring of the rat corticospinal tract after stroke , 2014, Science.

[21]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain , 2014, Nature.

[22]  G. Fink,et al.  Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  Rebecca A. Mease,et al.  Convergence of Cortical and Sensory Driver Inputs on Single Thalamocortical Cells , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Yusuke Takatsuru,et al.  Critical Role of the Astrocyte for Functional Remodeling in Contralateral Hemisphere of Somatosensory Cortex after Stroke , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Milos Pekny,et al.  Modulation of Neural Plasticity as a Basis for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Stroke.

[26]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Anqi Qiu,et al.  Robust Automatic Rodent Brain Extraction Using 3-D Pulse-Coupled Neural Networks (PCNN) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetics in Neural Systems , 2011, Neuron.

[29]  Majid H. Mohajerani,et al.  Targeted mini-strokes produce changes in interhemispheric sensory signal processing that are indicative of disinhibition within minutes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging, permanent pyramidal tract damage, and outcome in subcortical stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[31]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring , 2010, Nature.

[32]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Murtaza Z Mogri,et al.  Optical Deconstruction of Parkinsonian Neural Circuitry , 2009, Science.

[34]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  T. Murphy,et al.  In Vivo Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging in Adult Mice Reveals That Somatosensory Maps Lost to Stroke Are Replaced over Weeks by New Structural and Functional Circuits with Prolonged Modes of Activation within Both the Peri-Infarct Zone and Distant Sites , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  F. Cordelières,et al.  A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[37]  S. Carmichael Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: Making waves , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[38]  T. Wieloch,et al.  Enriched Environment Enhances Recovery of Motor Function after Focal Ischemia in Mice, and Downregulates the Transcription Factor NGFI-A , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[39]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke , 2005, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[40]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[41]  Sylvain V Costes,et al.  Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Aryeh Routtenberg,et al.  GAP-43: an intrinsic determinant of neuronal development and plasticity , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[43]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Dynamics of three-dimensional replication patterns during the S-phase, analysed by double labelling of DNA and confocal microscopy. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[44]  Jan G. Bjaalie,et al.  Organization of the pontine nuclei , 1992, Neuroscience Research.

[45]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[46]  AlexanderThiel,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015 .

[47]  A JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY REVIEW ARTICLE , 2022 .