Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems without Additional Information

Since the first Global Positioning System (GPS) studies in the mid-1990s, this method of surveying individual travel behavior has gained attention in transport research. Compared with classic travel survey methods, GPS studies offer researchers benefits of more accurate and reliable information. At the same time, the participants’ burden is reduced substantially if the GPS data collection does not involve time-consuming questions. However, without additional information, such as modes and trip purposes, extensive postprocessing is required to derive data that can be used for analysis and model estimation. The corresponding procedures are an ongoing research issue. This paper describes a postprocessing procedure needing no input other than the most basic GPS raw data: three-dimensional positions and the corresponding time stamps. First, the data are thoroughly cleaned and smoothed. Second, trips and activities are determined. Third, the trips are segmented into single-mode stages, and the transport mode for each of the stages is identified. The procedure is applied to GPS records collected in the Swiss cities of Zurich, Winterthur, and Geneva. A total of 4,882 participants carried an on-person GPS receiver for an average of 6.65 days. The results are compared with the Swiss Microcensus 2005 to demonstrate that derived data are ready for further applications, such as discrete choice model estimations.

[1]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Elimination of the Travel Diary: Experiment to Derive Trip Purpose from Global Positioning System Travel Data , 2001 .

[2]  Sheung Yuen Amy Tsui,et al.  Enhanced System for Link and Mode Identification for Personal Travel Surveys Based on Global Positioning Systems , 2006 .

[3]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Smoothing Methods to Minimize Impact of Global Positioning System Random Error on Travel Distance, Speed, and Acceleration Profile Estimates , 2006 .

[4]  R De Jong,et al.  WEARABLE GPS DEVICE AS A DATA COLLECTION METHOD FOR TRAVEL RESEARCH , 2003 .

[5]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Identifying trips and activities and their characteristics from GPS raw data without further information , 2008 .

[6]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Efficient Map Matching of Large Global Positioning System Data Sets: Tests on Speed-Monitoring Experiment in Zürich , 2005 .

[7]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Analysis of Global Positioning System-Based Data Collection Methods for Capturing Multistop Trip-Chaining Behavior , 1999 .

[8]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Where do you want to go today ?-More observations on daily mobility , 2003 .

[9]  J. Wolf Applications of New Technologies in Travel Surveys , 2006 .

[10]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Processing GPS data from travel surveys , 2005 .

[11]  C. Bhat,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Global Positioning System–Based and Travel Survey–Based Data: , 2006 .

[12]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Analysis of Commute Atlanta Instrumented Vehicle GPS Data: Destination Choice Behavior and Activity Spaces , 2006 .

[13]  Jianhe Du,et al.  Increasing the accuracy of trip rate information from passive multi-day GPS travel datasets: Automatic trip end identification issues , 2007 .

[14]  Eui-Hwan Chung,et al.  A Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS-based Personal Travel Surveys , 2005 .

[15]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Deducing mode and purpose from GPS data , 2008 .

[16]  S. Schönfelder,et al.  Where do you want to go today , 2003 .

[17]  J. Wolf,et al.  Impact of Underreporting on Mileage and Travel Time Estimates: Results from Global Positioning System-Enhanced Household Travel Survey , 2003 .

[18]  Jean Louise Wolf,et al.  Using GPS data loggers to replace travel diaries in the collection of travel data , 2000 .

[19]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Accuracy of Global Positioning System for Determining Driver Performance Parameters , 2002 .

[20]  Hota V. S. GangaRao,et al.  Fuzzy logic expert system for automated damage detection from changes in strain energy mode shapes , 2002 .

[21]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Eighty Weeks of Global Positioning System Traces: Approaches to Enriching Trip Information , 2004 .

[22]  Clarke Wilson,et al.  ClustalG: Software for analysis of activities and sequential events , 1999 .

[23]  Michael W. Flamm,et al.  Combining person based GPS tracking and prompted recall interviews for a comprehensive investigation of travel behaviour adaptation processes during life course transitions , 2007 .

[24]  Xing Xie,et al.  Learning transportation mode from raw gps data for geographic applications on the web , 2008, WWW.

[25]  Nelly Kalfs,et al.  Global Positioning System as Data Collection Method for Travel Research , 2000 .

[26]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Optimal parameter values for mode detection in GPS post-processing: An experiment , 2008 .

[27]  Sean T. Doherty,et al.  MOVING BEYOND OBSERVED OUTCOMES: INTEGRATING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS AND INTERACTIVE COMPUTER-BASED TRAVEL BEHAVIOR SURVEYS , 2001 .

[28]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Collecting and Processing Data from Mobile Technologies , 2009 .

[29]  Michael May,et al.  Modelling and prospects of the audience measurement for outdoor advertising based on data collection using GPS devices (electronic passive measurement system) , 2008 .

[30]  Shauna L. Hallmark,et al.  Accuracy Issues with Route Choice Data Collection by Using Global Positioning System , 1999 .

[31]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Enhanced System for Link and Mode Identification for Personal Travel Surveys Based on Global Positioning Systems , 2006 .