OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the use of a low-field magnetic resonance scanner for assessment of available bone for placement of osseo-integrated dental implants.
METHODS
Eleven Patients were examined to assess suitability for implant placement using a 0.2 tesla 'open' scanner. Imaging/surgical templates were constructed, with gadolinium markers to allow accurate location of the implant sites.
RESULTS
In all cases, localisation of potential implant sites was easily made and full information in all three planes readily available. Artefacts were few and localised, (noted on one site in one case only). Vital structures (nerves and vessels), and the variable geometry of the floor of the maxillary sinus were clearly seen, and cortical bone delineated from cancellous. The appearance of soft tissues in the scan allowed the surgeon to assess the final profile of the patient.
CONCLUSION
Low-field magnetic resonance imaging has definite potential for pre-implant assessment. Full sectional information is readily available at any desired plane with no need for reformatting. The information for accurate and safe implant placement is clear. The technique uses no ionising radiation. Further work is needed to evaluate spatial distortion caused by magnetic susceptibility effects at air/tissue interfaces, but our calculations indicate that at low field, using an appropriate protocol, the effect will not be substantial.
[1]
James Ra,et al.
Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry.
,
1991
.
[2]
R. Katzberg.
Temporomandibular joint imaging.
,
1989,
Anesthesia progress.
[3]
H G Gröndahl,et al.
The use of tomography for dental implant planning.
,
1997,
Dento maxillo facial radiology.
[4]
D Kohavi,et al.
Effect of axial plane deviation on cross-sectional height in reformatted computed tomography of the mandible.
,
1997,
Dento maxillo facial radiology.
[5]
M S Schwarz,et al.
Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery.
,
1989,
Dental clinics of North America.
[6]
L A Weinberg,et al.
CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation.
,
1993,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[7]
Gary H. Glover,et al.
MR susceptibility misregistration correction
,
1993,
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.
[8]
G. Bydder,et al.
INTRAVENOUS CHELATED GADOLINIUM AS A CONTRAST AGENT IN NMR IMAGING OF CEREBRAL TUMOURS
,
1984,
The Lancet.
[9]
F. Smith,et al.
Pre-surgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.
,
1996,
The Journal of oral implantology.