Precision of circular systematic sampling

In design stereology, many estimators require isotropic orientation of a test probe relative to the object in order to attain unbiasedness. In such cases, systematic sampling of orientations becomes imperative on grounds of efficiency and practical applicability. For instance, the planar nucleator and the vertical rotator imply systematic sampling on the circle, whereas the Buffon–Steinhaus method to estimate curve length in the plane, or the vertical designs to estimate surface area and curve length, imply systematic sampling on the semicircle. This leads to the need for predicting the precision of systematic sampling on the circle and the semicircle from a single sample. There are two main prediction approaches, namely the classical one of G. Matheron for non‐necessarily periodic measurement functions, and a recent approach based on a global symmetric model of the covariogram, more specific for periodic measurement functions. The latter approach seems at least as satisfactory as the former for small sample sizes, and it is developed here incorporating local errors. Detailed examples illustrating common stereological tools are included.

[1]  N Roberts,et al.  Unbiased volume estimation with coaxial sections: an application to the human bladder , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  Luis M. Cruz-Orive,et al.  Variance prediction under systematic sampling with geometric probes , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[3]  E. Weibel Stereological Methods. Practical methods for biological morphometry , 1979 .

[4]  Konrad Sandau,et al.  Unbiased Stereology. Three‐Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. , 1999 .

[5]  H. Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology — reconsidered , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  Arun M. Gokhale,et al.  Unbiased estimation of curve length in 3‐D using vertical slices , 1990 .

[7]  T. Mattfeldt,et al.  Orthogonal triplet probes: an efficient method for unbiased estimation of length and surface of objects with unknown orientation in space , 1985, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  Moses O. Tadé,et al.  FINAL COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS , 1999 .

[9]  Jacques Istas,et al.  Precision of systematic sampling and transitive methods , 1999 .

[10]  G. Matheron Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation : une application de la théorie de fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature , 1965 .

[11]  Ximo Gual-Arnau,et al.  Systematic sampling on the circle and on the sphere , 2000, Advances in Applied Probability.

[12]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The nucleator , 1988, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  E. B. VEDEL JENSEN,et al.  The rotator , 1993 .

[14]  L. Cruz-Orive,et al.  Variance prediction for pseudosystematic sampling on the sphere , 2002, Advances in Applied Probability.

[15]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[16]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Estimation of surface area from vertical sections , 1986, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  Jan Pedersen,et al.  A Deformable Template Model, with Special Reference to Elliptical Templates , 2002, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[18]  G Hung,et al.  Stereological methods. Vol. 1: Practical methods for biological morphometry By . Academic Press, New York/London, 1979. xvi + 415 pp., $57.50 , 1984 .

[19]  M. García-Fiñana,et al.  New approximations for the variance in Cavalieri sampling , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  C. Vyvyan Howard,et al.  Estimating the length of a bounded curve in three dimensions using total vertical projections , 1991 .

[21]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors , 1999, Journal of microscopy.