A new computer vision-based system to help clinicians objectively assess visual pursuit with the moving mirror stimulus for the diagnosis of minimally conscious state

Minimally conscious state (MCS) is a neurological syndrome in which the patient shows signs of partial consciousness after having emerged from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), which itself follows a state of coma. Distinguishing between MCS and UWS is complex and has major impact on the clinical management and prognosis of affected patients. Research on disorders of consciousness (DoC) has revealed that (1) visual pursuit, i.e. the ability of a patient to track a moving stimulus, is one of the most decisive clinical signs for establishing the MCS/UWS distinction, and that (2) the most effective moving stimulus for visual pursuit assessment is a mirror where the patient can see his/her own face. In clinical practice, while this guidance is widely followed, the visual pursuit ability is typically assessed on the basis of the clinician's opinion only, i.e. in a subjective thus biased manner. In this paper, we present a new system using cameras and computer vision techniques, which helps clinicians to objectify the assessment of visual pursuit. Our system is specifically designed to work with the moving mirror stimulus in order to follow the recommended, well-established clinical setup. We validate our system on healthy control subjects and give preliminary results obtained with DoC patients.

[1]  J. Giacino,et al.  The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria , 2002, Neurology.

[2]  T Sarraf,et al.  Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states , 2010, Neurology.

[3]  Qiang Ji,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: A Survey of Models for Eyes and Gaze , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  F. Plum,et al.  The diagnosis of stupor and coma. , 1972, Contemporary neurology series.

[6]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  Monocular Model-Based 3D Tracking of Rigid Objects: A Survey , 2005, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[7]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[8]  Rui Rodrigues,et al.  Camera Pose Estimation Using Images of Planar Mirror Reflections , 2010, ECCV.

[9]  A. Vanhaudenhuyse,et al.  Detection of visual pursuit in patients in minimally conscious state: A matter of stimuli and visual plane? , 2014, Brain injury.

[10]  Takahiro Ishikawa,et al.  The template update problem , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Albert K. Kurtz,et al.  Pearson Product Moment Coefficient of Correlation , 1979 .

[12]  Greg Welch,et al.  Welch & Bishop , An Introduction to the Kalman Filter 2 1 The Discrete Kalman Filter In 1960 , 1994 .

[13]  L. Santoro,et al.  Quantitative assessment of visual behavior in disorders of consciousness , 2012, Journal of Neurology.

[14]  L. Santoro,et al.  Affective saliency modifies visual tracking behavior in disorders of consciousness: a quantitative analysis , 2012, Journal of Neurology.

[15]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose states: use a mirror , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[16]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Walter G Sannita,et al.  Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome , 2010, BMC medicine.