Modulating cortical excitability in acute stroke: A repetitive TMS study

OBJECTIVE Changes in cerebral cortex excitability have been demonstrated after a stroke and are considered relevant for recovery. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain can modulate cerebral cortex excitability and, when rTMS is given as theta burst stimulation (TBS), LTP- or LTD-like changes can be induced. The aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of TBS on cortical excitability in acute stroke. METHODS In 12 acute stroke patients, we explored the effects of facilitatory TBS of the affected hemisphere and of inhibitory TBS of the unaffected hemisphere on cortical excitability to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on both sides. The effects produced by TBS in patients were compared with those observed in a control group of age-matched healthy individuals. RESULTS In patients, both the facilitatory TBS of the affected motor cortex and the inhibitory TBS of the unaffected motor cortex produced a significant increase of the amplitude of MEPs evoked by stimulation of the affected hemisphere. The effects observed in patients were comparable to those observed in controls. CONCLUSIONS Facilitatory TBS over the stroke hemisphere and inhibitory TBS over the intact hemisphere in acute phase enhance the excitability of the lesioned motor cortex. SIGNIFICANCE TBS might be useful to promote cortical plasticity in stroke patients.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[2]  T. Neumann-Haefelin,et al.  Increased long‐term potentiation in the surround of experimentally induced focal cortical infarction , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[3]  Armin Thron,et al.  Motor representation in patients rapidly recovering after stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: A computer-based human model study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Ducarne,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Effects on the right motor hand‐area excitability produced by low‐frequency rTMS over human contralateral homologous cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R N Lemon,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1 , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Lefaucheur.  Stroke recovery can be enhanced by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) , 2006, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  P M Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Abbruzzese,et al.  Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Ridding,et al.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? , 2003, Neurology.

[14]  Y. Z. Huang,et al.  Theta‐burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  G. Hagemann,et al.  Electrophysiological transcortical diaschisis after cortical photothrombosis in rat brain. , 1996, Stroke.

[16]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the `affected' and `unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke , 1998, Brain Research.

[17]  John Rothwell,et al.  Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[18]  Volker Hömberg,et al.  Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Direct Demonstration That Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Can Enhance Corticospinal Excitability in Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[20]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  The functional anatomy of cerebral reorganisation after focal brain injury , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[21]  P. Rossini,et al.  Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  Victor De Pasqua,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[25]  O. Witte,et al.  Physiology of modulation of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[27]  T. Bliss,et al.  Plasticity in the human central nervous system. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  W. Cowan,et al.  Changes in the concentrations of the two brain specific proteins, s-100 and 14-3-2, during the development of the avian optic tectum. , 1970, Brain research.

[30]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[32]  P Noël,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  Interhemispheric Asymmetries of Motor Cortex Excitability in the Postacute Stroke Stage: A Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Stroke.

[34]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Neurology.

[35]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[36]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  U. Ziemann.  Improving disability in stroke with RTMS , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[38]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Ipsilateral Motor Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects and Acute-Stroke Patients , 2001, Stroke.

[39]  Steven D. Freedman,et al.  A Sham-Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients , 2006, Stroke.

[40]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.