Sediment Mobility Effects on Seabed Resistance for Unburied Pipelines

In order to design unburied pipelines, pipeline engineers require information about lateral and axial seabed resistances (normally known as 'friction factors') prior to and during operation. Geotechnical engineers must provide this information based on knowledge of pipeline properties, seabed conditions and metocean conditions. Accurate prediction of the seabed resistances requires accurate prediction of pipeline embedments. This paper discusses how pipeline embedments and geometries can change from the as-laid state as the result of sediment mobility around pipelines and demonstrates how these embedment changes will change the pipe-soil friction factors using a series of numerical analyses. Sediment mobility tends to cause a general trend of increasing pipe embedment, which is beneficial for hydrodynamic stability but can be onerous for thermal buckling. Recommendations are provided to accommodate these effects in design, without unnecessary levels of over-conservatism.

[1]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Analysis of the undrained breakout resistance of partially embedded pipelines. , 2007 .

[2]  R. Soulsby Dynamics of marine sands , 1997 .

[3]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Pipeline Embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment , 2008 .

[4]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Pipeline stability revisited , 2012 .

[5]  Fangjun Li,et al.  Numerical Model for Local Scour under Offshore Pipelines , 1999 .

[6]  B. Brørs Numerical Modeling of Flow and Scour at Pipelines , 1999 .

[7]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Interaction Between Vibrating Pipe and Erodible Bed , 1988 .

[8]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Local Scour Below a Piggyback Pipeline in Currents , 2008 .

[9]  David White,et al.  Progress in Investigating Pipe-Soil-Fluid Interaction: The STABLEpipe JIP , 2010 .

[10]  Y Mao,et al.  THE INTERACTION BETWEEN A PIPELINE AND AN ERODIBLE BED , 1987 .

[11]  Yinghui Tian,et al.  Pipeline Lateral Buckling: Realistic Modelling of Geotechnical Variability and Uncertainty , 2014 .

[12]  R. Verley,et al.  A Soil Resistance Model for Pipelines Placed on Sandy Soils , 1994 .

[13]  R. S. Merifield,et al.  Effect of Surface Heave on Response of Partially Embedded Pipelines on Clay , 2009 .

[14]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Pipeline stability on a mobile and liquefied seabed: a discussion of magnitudes and engineering implications , 2001 .

[15]  Dongfang Liang,et al.  Numerical modeling of flow and scour below a pipeline in currents: Part II. Scour simulation , 2005 .

[16]  Beverley Ronalds,et al.  Field Observations and Modelling of the Self-Burial of a North West Shelf Pipeline , 2003 .

[17]  J. Fredsøe,et al.  Scour Below Pipelines in Waves , 1990 .

[18]  Mark Randolph,et al.  The influence of sea state on as-laid pipeline embedment: A case study , 2010 .

[19]  Bin Teng,et al.  Three-dimensional scour below offshore pipelines in steady currents , 2009 .

[20]  David White,et al.  A new facility for studying ocean-structure-seabed interactions: The O-Tube , 2013 .

[21]  Bin Teng,et al.  A numerical model for onset of scour below offshore pipelines , 2009 .

[22]  Fangjun Li,et al.  Prediction of Lee-Wake Scouring of Pipelines in Currents , 2001 .

[23]  David White,et al.  Modelling the dynamic embedment of seabed pipelines , 2011 .