Comparison of the Ku-Band Range Noise Level and the Relative Sea-State Bias of the Jason-1, TOPEX, and Poseidon-1 Radar Altimeters Special Issue: Jason-1 Calibration/Validation

TOPEX/Poseidon is a well known success, with the operational altimeter (TOPEX) and the experimental one (Poseidon-1), providing data of unprecedented quality. However, there are two major differences between the TOPEX and Poseidon-1 radar altimeters on board TOPEX/Poseidon. The first is related to the estimated range noise; the second is linked to the sea-state bias (SSB) model estimates. Since the recent launch of the Jason-1 radar altimeter (also called Poseidon-2), we have been cross-comparing these three systems to better characterize each of them. Analyzing standard user products, we have found that Jason-1 is behaving like Poseidon-1 and thus shows the same observed differences when compared with TOPEX. A comparative analysis of their features was performed, starting from the on-board acquisition of the ocean return and ending with the ground generation of the high level accuracy oceanographic product. The results lead us to believe that the sources for these differences lie in both the waveform tracking processing and the presence or abscence of a retracking procedure whether on-board or on ground. Because Poseidon-1 and Jason-1 waveforms are retracked while TOPEX waveforms are not in the products distributed to the users, we have applied the same ground retracking algorithm to the waveforms of the three radar altimeters to get consistent data sets. The analysis of the outputs has shown that: (a) the noise level for the three radar altimeters is definitively the same, and (b) the source of the relative SSB between Jason-1 and TOPEX lies in the different behavior of the on-board tracking softwares.

[1]  Edward J. Walsh,et al.  Pulse‐to‐pulse correlation in satellite radar altimeters , 1982 .

[2]  Ernesto Rodriguez,et al.  Assessment of the TOPEX altimeter performance using waveform retracking , 1994 .

[3]  G. Brown.  The average impulse response of a rough surface and its applications , 1977 .

[4]  G. S. Hayne,et al.  NASA radar altimeter for the TOPEX/POSEIDON Project , 1991, Proc. IEEE.

[5]  Graham D. Quartly,et al.  Analyzing altimeter artifacts: statistical properties of ocean waveforms , 2001 .

[6]  Philippe Gaspar,et al.  Improving Nonparametric Estimates of the Sea State Bias in Radar Altimeter Measurements of Sea Level , 2002 .

[7]  G. Hayne,et al.  Radar altimeter mean return waveforms from near-normal-incidence ocean surface scattering , 1980 .

[8]  S. Desai,et al.  Jason-1 : Geophysical Performance Evaluation , 2002 .

[9]  G. Carayon,et al.  JASON1 mission : POSEIDON-2 Radar Altimeter Design and Results of in flight Performances , 2002 .

[10]  David W. Hancock,et al.  The corrections for significant wave height and attitude effects in the TOPEX radar altimeter , 1994 .

[11]  Ernesto Rodríguez,et al.  Correlation properties of ocean altimeter returns , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  E. J. Christensen,et al.  TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overview , 1994 .

[13]  Philippe Gaspar,et al.  Estimating the sea state bias of the TOPEX and POSEIDON altimeters from crossover differences , 1994 .

[14]  Edward J. Walsh,et al.  Pulse Compression and Sea Level Tracking in Satellite Altimetry , 1989 .

[15]  Paul C. Marth,et al.  Prelaunch performance of the NASA altimeter for the TOPEX/Poseidon project , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Ernesto Rodriguez,et al.  Altimetry for non‐Gaussian oceans: Height biases and estimation of parameters , 1988 .

[17]  David W. Hancock,et al.  Assessment of the Cycle-to-Cycle Noise Level of the Geosat Follow-On, TOPEX, and Poseidon Altimeters , 2002 .

[18]  P. Raizonville,et al.  Poseidon Radar Altimeter Flight Model Design and Tests Results , 1991, [Proceedings] IGARSS'91 Remote Sensing: Global Monitoring for Earth Management.