Safe Joint Mechanism Based on Passive Compliance for Collision Safety

A safe robot arm can be achieved by either a passive or active compliance system. A passive compliance system composed of purely mechanical elements often provide faster and more reliable responses for dynamic collision than an active one involving sensors and actuators. Since both positioning accuracy and collision safety are important, a robot arm should exhibit very low stiffness when subjected to a collision force greater than the one causing human injury, but maintain very high stiffness otherwise. To implement these requirements, a novel safe joint mechanism (SJM), which consists of linear springs and a slider-crank mechanism, is proposed in this research. The SJM has the advantages of variable stiffness which can be achieved only by passive mechanical elements. Various experiments of static and dynamic collisions showed the high stiffness of the SJM against an external force of less than the critical impact force, but an abrupt drop in the stiffness when the external force exceeds the critical force, thus guaranteeing collision safety. Furthermore, the critical impact force can be set to any value depending on the application.

[1]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Development of one-DOF robot arm equipped with mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[3]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe Link Mechanism based on Passive Compliance for Safe Human-Robot Collision , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Charles E. Wilson,et al.  Kinematics and dynamics of machinery , 1983 .

[6]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Design of programmable passive compliance shoulder mechanism , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[7]  Yasuyuki Yamada,et al.  Fail-safe human/robot contact in the safety space , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[8]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .