Tacit Knowledge: A Refinement and Empirical Test of the Academic Tacit Knowledge Scale

Researchers have linked tacit knowledge to improved organizational performance, but research on how to measure tacit knowledge is scarce. In the present study, the authors proposed and empirically tested a model of tacit knowledge and an accompanying measurement scale of academic tacit knowledge. They present 6 hypotheses that support the proposed tacit knowledge model regarding the role of cognitive (self-motivation, self-organization); technical (individual task, institutional task); and social (task-related, general) skills. The authors tested these hypotheses with 542 responses to the Academic Tacit Knowledge Scale, which included the respondents' grade point average—the performance variable. All 6 hypotheses were supported.

[1]  Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Knowledge management in international mergers , 2002 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[3]  Joseph A. Horvath,et al.  Tacit knowledge in professional practice : researcher and practitioner perspectives , 2000 .

[4]  Douglas M. Hawkins,et al.  Interactive LISREL : user's guide , 2001 .

[5]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[6]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[7]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[8]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[9]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical Intelligence: The Nature and Role of Tacit Knowledge in Work and at School , 2018, Mechanisms of Everyday Cognition.

[10]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[12]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[13]  G. Dunteman.  Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[15]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[16]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. , 1987 .

[17]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[18]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[19]  Wendy M. Williams,et al.  Testing common sense. , 1995 .

[20]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[21]  Anit Somech,et al.  Tacit Knowledge in Academia: Its Effects on Student Learning and Achievement , 1999 .

[22]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  The Tacit Knowledge of Productive Scholars in Education. , 2004 .

[23]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[24]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[25]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Deidra J. Schleicher,et al.  On Selecting Psychology Graduate Students: Validity Evidence for a Test of Tacit Knowledge , 2004 .

[28]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[29]  Vesa Suutari,et al.  International knowledge transfers through expatriates , 2004 .

[30]  Elena L. Grigorenko,et al.  Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life , 2000 .