The myth of objectivity: is medicine moving towards a social constructivist medical paradigm?

Biomedicine is improperly imbued with a nomothetic methodology, which views 'disease' in a similar way to other 'natural' phenomena. This arises from a 300-year history of a positivist domination of science, meaning that objectivist research (e.g. randomized controlled trials or biochemical research) attracts more funding and is more readily published than 'softer' qualitative research. A brief review of objectivism and subjectivism is followed by a definition of an emerging medical paradigm. Current 'inappropriate' medical practices become understandable in this broader context, and examples are given. A constructivist paradigm can continue to incorporate 'objective' clinical findings and interventions, as well as the recent evidence for the doctor-patient relationship as a major contributor to patient outcomes.

[1]  A. Chapple,et al.  Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism? , 1998, Family practice.

[2]  E. Cassell.  Doctoring: The Nature of Primary Care Medicine , 1997 .

[3]  W H Glazier,et al.  The task of medicine. , 1973, Scientific American.

[4]  W. Heisenberg.  Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science , 1958 .

[5]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[6]  E. Guba,et al.  The Paradigm dialog , 1990 .

[7]  Roger Neighbour,et al.  The Inner Consultation: How to Develop an Effective and Intuitive Consulting Style , 1997 .

[8]  W. Osler.  Aequanimitas with Other Addresses to Medical Students, Nurses and Practitioners of Medicine , 1939, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[9]  W. A. Thomson,et al.  The doctor-patient relationship , 1976 .

[10]  M. Evans,et al.  The 'heartsink' patient revisited. The Welsh Philosophy And General Practice discussion Group. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  Rupert Sheldrake,et al.  Seven Experiments That Could Change the World , 1996 .

[12]  E. Murphy,et al.  Combining qualitative interviews with video-recorded consultations: gaining insight into GPs' decision-making. , 1999, Family practice.

[13]  C. Mattingly,et al.  In search of the good: narrative reasoning in clinical practice. , 1998, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[14]  G. Dickie,et al.  The physician's actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. , 1986, The Journal of family practice.

[15]  J E Groves.  Taking care of the hateful patient. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease , 1989, Medical care.

[17]  M. Stewart.  Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[18]  J. Crary.  Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the 19th Century , 1990 .

[19]  M BALINT,et al.  The doctor, his patient, and the illness. , 1957, Lancet.

[20]  W E Fabb,et al.  The trouble with family medicine. , 1997, Family practice.

[21]  Simon Sinclair,et al.  Making Doctors: An Institutional Apprenticeship , 1997 .

[22]  K. Hunter,et al.  Doctors' Stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge , 1991 .

[23]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[24]  P. Byrne,et al.  Doctors talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviour of general practitioners consulting in their surgeries , 1976 .

[25]  N. Britten,et al.  Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. , 1995, Family practice.

[26]  B. Korsch,et al.  Doctor-patient communication. , 1972, Scientific American.

[27]  R. Baron.  An introduction to medical phenomenology: I can't hear you while I'm listening. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[28]  L. Frederikson,et al.  Development of an Integrative Model for Medical Consultation , 1993 .

[29]  J. Dale,et al.  Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. , 1998, Family practice.

[30]  B. A. Ryan.  Does Postmodernism Mean the End of Science in the Behavioral Sciences, and Does it Matter Anyway? , 1999 .

[31]  A. Janos.  Politics and Paradigms: Changing Theories of Change in Social Science , 1986 .

[32]  Ian R. McWhinney,et al.  A textbook of family medicine , 1997 .

[33]  T. O'dowd.  Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. , 1988, BMJ.

[34]  A R Feinstein,et al.  What kind of basic science for clinical medicine? , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  I R McWhinney,et al.  The doctor/patient relationship and its effect upon outcome. , 1979, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[36]  P. Kinnersley.  The patient-centredness of consultations and the relationship to outcomes in primary care. , 1996 .

[37]  W. Katon,et al.  The medical care abuser: differential diagnosis and management. , 1981, The Journal of family practice.

[38]  C. Delkeskamp-Hayes,et al.  Science, Technology, and the Art of Medicine , 1993 .

[39]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research and family practice: a marriage made in heaven? , 1992, Family practice.

[40]  H Spiro,et al.  What is empathy and can it be taught? , 1992, Annals of internal medicine.

[41]  J. Brown.  Patient-centred medicine: Transforming the clinical method , 1998 .