Heart rate independent QT variability component can detect subclinical cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes

Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) may lead to life threatening arrhythmia due to denervation of both the parasympathetic and sympathetic branches of autonomic nervous system innervating the heart. CAN is a frequently under diagnosed complication of diabetes, because a patient can have asymptomatic CAN for several years before it is clinically apparent. However, detection of CAN at the early or subclinical stage leads to more effective treatment outcomes. Cardiac autonomic reflex tests (CART) (i.e. Ewing test battery) are normally used for the detection and staging of CAN. These tests have limitations with the necessity of active participation of the patients for test maneuvers, as a majority of patients will not be able to complete all five tests required due to comorbidities such as frailty, obesity or cardiorespiratory disease. CAN affects both heart rate (measured by RR interval dynamics) and ventricular repolarization function (i.e. QT interval dynamics) of the heart, which can be efficiently analyzed from surface ECG. Therefore, ECG based diagnosis techniques of CAN analysis are becoming popular as they can reduce the limitations of CARTs used traditionally for CAN detection and it complements CART results. In this study, the performance of an ECG based QTV feature derived using a model free approach, which can quantify the QTV component not affected directly by the heart rate (HR) variation, is compared with some other measures of QTV and HRV in subclinical CAN detection in diabetes. Short-term ECGs (i.e. 5 min long) of 60 diabetic subjects without CAN and 50 diabetic subjects detected with early level of CAN determined by CART were analyzed. The proposed measure for quantifying the QTV component independent of HR denoted as QTV~RR stands out to be more discriminatory than other existing variability measures of QTV and HRV in subclinical detection of CAN.

[1]  Maik C. Stüttgen,et al.  Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Analyzing Systolic-Diastolic Interval Interaction Characteristics in Diabetic Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy Progression , 2015, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[3]  D. Ewing,et al.  The Value of Cardiovascular Autonomic Function Tests: 10 Years Experience in Diabetes , 1985, Diabetes Care.

[4]  M. Kuehl,et al.  Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathies as complications of diabetes mellitus , 2012, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[5]  D. Seals,et al.  The influence of aging on the human sympathetic nervous system and brain norepinephrine turnover. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[6]  H. Calkins,et al.  Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  Herbert F. Jelinek,et al.  An innovative Multi-disciplinary Diabetes Complications Screening Program in a Rural Community: A Description and Preliminary Results of the Screening , 2006 .

[8]  Rodica Pop-Busui,et al.  Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Diabetes , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  A novel technique to investigate the effect of ageing on ventricular repolarization characteristics in healthy and LQTS subjects , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  Godfrey L. Smith,et al.  QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Detecting Subclinical Diabetic Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy by Analyzing Ventricular Repolarization Dynamics , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[12]  A. Porta,et al.  RT variability unrelated to heart period and respiration progressively increases during graded head-up tilt. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[14]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[15]  R. Berger,et al.  Predictive Value of Beat-to-Beat QT Variability Index Across the Continuum of Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Competing Risks of Noncardiac or Cardiovascular Death and Sudden or Nonsudden Cardiac Death , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[16]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  T. Schlegel,et al.  The effect of aging and cardiac disease on that portion of QT interval variability that is independent of Heart Rate Variability , 2008, 2008 Computers in Cardiology.

[18]  R. Freeman,et al.  Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: clinical impact, assessment, diagnosis, and management , 2011, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[19]  M. Baumert,et al.  QT Interval Variability in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Cardiac Sympathetic Dysinnervation Assessed by 123I‐Metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.