A simple model for mantle-driven flow at the top of Earth’s core

We derive a model for the steady fluid flow at the top of Earth’s core driven by thermal coupling with the heterogeneous lower mantle. The model uses a thermal wind balance for the core flow, and assumes a proportionality between the horizontal density gradients at the top of the core and horizontal gradients in seismic shear velocity in the lowermost mantle. It also assumes a proportionality between the core fluid velocity and its radial shear. This last assumption is validated by comparison with numerical models of mantle-driven core flow, including self-sustaining dynamo (supercritical) models and non-magnetic convection (subcritical) models. The numerical dynamo models show that thermal winds with correlated velocity and radial shear dominate the boundary-driven large-scale flow at the top of the core. We then compare the thermal wind flow predicted by mantle heterogeneity with the 150 year time-average flow obtained from inverting the historical geomagnetic secular variation, focusing on the non-zonal components of the flows because of their sensitivity to the boundary heterogeneity. Comparing magnitudes provides an estimate of the ratio of lower mantle seismic anomalies to core density anomalies. Comparing patterns shows that the thermal wind model and the time-average geomagnetic flow have comparable length scales and exhibit some important similarities, including an anticlockwise vortex below the southern Indian and Atlantic Oceans, and another anticlockwise vortex below Asia, suggesting these parts of the non-zonal core flow could be thermally controlled by the mantle. In other regions, however, the two flows do not match well, and some possible reasons for the dissimilarity between the predicted and observed core flow are identified. We propose that better agreement could be obtained using core flows derived from geomagnetic secular variation over longer time periods.

[1]  J. Aurnou,et al.  Diffusive magnetic images of upwelling patterns in the core , 2002 .

[2]  Catherine Constable,et al.  Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 1. A new global data compilation , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Ohishi,et al.  Post-Perovskite Phase Transition in MgSiO3 , 2004, Science.

[4]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors , 2006 .

[5]  Joseph S. Resovsky,et al.  Probabilistic Tomography Maps Chemical Heterogeneities Throughout the Lower Mantle , 2004, Science.

[6]  Vincent Courtillot,et al.  How complex is the time-averaged geomagnetic field over the past 5 Myr? , 1998 .

[7]  P. Olson,et al.  Helical core flow from geomagnetic secular variation , 2004 .

[8]  Michael W. McElhinny,et al.  The time-averaged paleomagnetic field 0–5 Ma , 1996 .

[9]  M. Mandea,et al.  Time evolution of the fluid flow at the top of the core. Geomagnetic jerks , 2000 .

[10]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  On core surface flows inferred from satellite magnetic data , 2005 .

[11]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Fluid flow near the surface of Earth's outer core , 1991 .

[13]  David A. Schneider,et al.  The time‐averaged paleomagnetic field , 1990 .

[14]  G. Glatzmaier,et al.  Magnetoconvection and thermal coupling of the Earth's core and mantle , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  S. Gibbons,et al.  Convection in the Earth’s core driven by lateral variations in the core–mantle boundary heat flux , 2000 .

[16]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  J. Aubert Steady zonal flows in spherical shell dynamos , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  U. Christensen,et al.  Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration , 1999 .

[19]  J. A. Jacobs,et al.  The Earth's deep interior , 1976, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  L. Lines Introduction to the Physics of the Earth's Interior , 2001 .

[21]  A. Chulliat,et al.  Local computation of the geostrophic pressure at the top of the core , 2000 .

[22]  C. Johnson,et al.  Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years: transient or permanent flux lobes? , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field , 1994 .

[24]  J. Holton Geophysical fluid dynamics. , 1983, Science.

[25]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Deep-mantle high-viscosity flow and thermochemical structure inferred from seismic and geodynamic data , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Statistical palaeomagnetic field modelling and dynamo numerical simulation , 2005 .

[27]  M.S.T. Bukowinski,et al.  Introduction to the physics of the earth's interior , 1992 .

[28]  D. Yuen,et al.  Geophysical inferences of thermal‐chemical structures in the lower mantle , 1993 .

[29]  David Gubbins,et al.  Persistent patterns in the geomagnetic field over the past 2.5 Myr , 1993, Nature.

[30]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  The time-averaged magnetic field in numerical dynamos with non-uniform boundary heat flow , 2002 .

[31]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Core flow inversion tested with numerical dynamo models , 2000 .

[32]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Detecting thermal boundary control in surface flows from numerical dynamos , 2007 .

[33]  P. Roberts Electromagnetic Core-Mantle Coupling , 1972 .

[34]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  The role of the Earth's mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals , 1999, Nature.

[35]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[36]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Secular variation in numerical geodynamo models with lateral variations of boundary heat flow , 2003 .

[37]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Length of day decade variations, torsional oscillations and inner core superrotation: evidence from recovered core surface zonal flows , 2000 .

[38]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Statistical palaeomagnetic field modelling and symmetry considerations , 2005 .

[39]  R. Holme Electromagnetic core—mantle coupling—I. Explaining decadal changes in the length of day , 2002 .

[40]  U. Christensen,et al.  Tests of core flow imaging methods with numerical dynamos , 2007 .

[41]  P. Olson,et al.  Time-average and time-dependent parts of core flow , 2006 .

[42]  Richard Holme,et al.  Large-Scale Flow in the Core , 2007 .

[43]  D. Gubbins,et al.  Thermal core– mantle interactions , 1987, Nature.

[44]  Catherine Constable,et al.  The time-averaged geomagnetic field as recorded by lava flows over the past 5 Myr , 1995 .

[45]  J. Bloxham Simple models of fluid flow at the core surface derived from geomagnetic field models , 1989 .

[46]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  An analysis of the geomagnetic field over the past 2000 years , 1998 .

[47]  木村 竜治,et al.  J. Pedlosky: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, New York and Heidelberg, 1979, xii+624ページ, 23.5×15.5cm, $39.8. , 1981 .

[48]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos , 2002 .