Enhanced bone apposition to Brazilian microrough titanium surfaces.

It has recently been reported that machined and microrough (micro) Brazilian titanium (Ti) implants have good production standards. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo bone formation around 2 different implant surfaces placed in dog's mandible. Thirty-two screw-typed Ti implants were used in this study. Mandibular premolars were extracted in 8 dogs and, after 12 weeks, 2 machined (Neodent Titamax, Brazil) and 2 micro implants (Neodent Titamax Porous, Brazil) were placed in each animal. Biopsies were taken at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation and stained with Stevenel's blue and Alizarin red for histomorphometric measurements of bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone area between threads (BABT) and bone area within the mirror area (BAMA). Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05). While at 3 weeks micro implants exhibited significantly more BIC than machined ones (55 +/- 12.5% and 35.6 +/- 15%, p<0.05), no significant difference in such parameter was detected at 8 weeks (51.2 +/- 21% and 48.6 +/- 18.1%, p>0.05). There were no significant differences in BABT and BAMA between the implants. Micro surfaces promoted higher contact osteogenesis. These data indicate that this commercial micro Ti implant surface enhances contact osteogenesis at an early post-implantation period when compared to the machined one.

[1]  R. Chiesa,et al.  Bone response to a Ca- and P-enriched titanium surface obtained by anodization. , 2008, Brazilian dental journal.

[2]  A. Nanci,et al.  Treatment of a commercial, machined surface titanium implant with H2SO4/H2O2 enhances contact osteogenesis. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  M. Martins,et al.  Surface characterization of titanium Based dental implants , 2006 .

[4]  P. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Effect of Microcapsules Containing TAK-778 on Bone Formation Around Osseointegrated Implants: Histomorphometric Analysis in Dogs , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[5]  U. Wikesjö,et al.  Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  N. Lang,et al.  Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  D Buser,et al.  What is This? Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on February 23, 2013 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. International and American Associations for Dental ResearchRESEARCH REPORTS , 2004 .

[8]  M. Morra,et al.  Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  M. Morra,et al.  Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis. , 2003, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[10]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  S. Mishra,et al.  Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  D. Puleo,et al.  Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[13]  L. Nolte,et al.  Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  J. Davies,et al.  Mechanisms of endosseous integration. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  P. François,et al.  Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (II) Adsorption isotherms and biological activity of immobilized fibronectin. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  P Descouts,et al.  Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. (I) Surface characterization. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  J. Lemons,et al.  Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[19]  R. Tuan,et al.  Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[20]  S D Cook,et al.  The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  C. Maniatopoulos,et al.  An improved method for preparing histological sections of metallic implants. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.