Monitoring near-surface soil water content using an innovative perforated cylinder coaxial dielectric sensor

Abstract Near-surface soil water content (NSWC) is an important parameter for characterizing hydrological processes, water and vapor exchange at the soil-atmosphere boundary, and potential biological productivity. Here we develop a dielectric based frequency-domain (FD) impedance sensor operating at 100 MHz, with a novel coaxial probe design and a temperature sensor embedded in the circuit board. This perforated cylinder coaxial (PCC) sensor provides simultaneous measurements of volumetric soil water content (VSWC) and of temperature. The temperature measurement allows signal correction for the temperature response of the circuit board and of the permittivity of soil water. We characterize the performance of the PCC sensor and compare it with alternative 3-pin- and 2-pin-electrode FD impedance sensors each using a similarly performing circuit board. A series of theoretical analyses and experiments were conducted, including (i) sensors calibration, (ii) temperature effects and their correction, (iii) soil volume sensed by each sensor through simulation analysis and a stepwise soil removal (SSR) test and (iv) accuracy comparison of the three sensors when applied for the NSWC measurements. The calibration results verified that the PCC, 3-pin and 2-pin probes were suitable to measure VSWC (RMSE ≤ 0.0142 cm3 cm−3). The simulation analysis using High Frequency Structure Simulator software (HFSS) indicated that the novel PCC probe had a symmetrical distribution of the E-field, wholly contained within the cylinder, avoiding leakage of the E-Field into air at the soil-atmosphere interface and removing the dependency of sensed volume on VSWC. The results of the SSR test showed that the E-field distributed outside the receiving electrode of the PCC probe could be ignored whereas that of both pin-type electrodes was distributed outside of the receiving electrode to a distance that depended on VSWC (i.e. up to 8 mm for 3-pin and up to 11 mm for 2-pin designs when VSWC > 0.17 cm3 cm−3), which corresponds to the simulation analysis. Moreover, the new PCC probe provided more accurate NSWC measurement than 3-pin or 2-pin probes because the E-field was contained within the perforated cylinder, avoiding E-field leakage and fixing sensed soil volume independent of VSWC. The pin-structure probes appear to perform best when installed horizontally in the soil at least 11 mm below the surface.

[1]  Y. Kerr,et al.  State of the Art in Large-Scale Soil Moisture Monitoring , 2013 .

[2]  S. Jones,et al.  A TDR Array Probe for Monitoring Near‐Surface Soil Moisture Distribution , 2017 .

[3]  Hai Liu,et al.  In-Situ Measurement of Soil Permittivity at Various Depths for the Calibration and Validation of Low-Frequency SAR Soil Moisture Models by Using GPR , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[4]  George P. Petropoulos,et al.  Surface soil moisture retrievals from remote sensing: Current status, products & future trends , 2015 .

[5]  J. Miller,et al.  Measurement of Soil Water Content Using a Simplified Impedance Measuring Technique , 1996 .

[6]  R. C. Weast CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[7]  J. Knight Sensitivity of time domain reflectometry measurements to lateral variations in soil water content , 1992 .

[8]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations , 2012 .

[9]  Mitsuhiro Inoue,et al.  Empirical Temperature Calibration of Capacitance Probes to Measure Soil Water , 2009 .

[10]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[11]  Shafiqul Islam,et al.  Estimation of root zone soil moisture and surface fluxes partitioning using near surface soil moisture measurements , 2002 .

[12]  J. Monteith,et al.  The Scope of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[13]  Sun,et al.  An Improved Frequency Domain Technique for Determining Soil Water Content , 2005 .

[14]  Dani Or,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar measurement of soil water content dynamics using a suspended horn antenna , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  T. J. Dean,et al.  SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE, PART I. SENSOR DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[16]  Y.‐C. Gao,et al.  Evaluation of high-resolution satellite precipitation products using rain gauge observations over the Tibetan Plateau , 2012 .

[17]  F. Baret,et al.  Relating soil surface moisture to reflectance , 2002 .

[18]  Peter Schulze Lammers,et al.  A Novel Method to Determine the Volume of Sensitivity for Soil Moisture Sensors , 2012 .

[19]  R. Schulin,et al.  Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach , 1990 .

[20]  S. Zegelin,et al.  Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometry , 1989 .

[21]  Budiman P. A. Rohman,et al.  Near-surface soil water content estimation using UWB-GPR based on selective sparse representation , 2018, 2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[22]  C. G. Gardner,et al.  High dielectric constant microwave probes for sensing soil moisture , 1974 .

[23]  Heather McNairn,et al.  Evaluation of near-surface soil moisture data from an AAFC monitoring network in Manitoba, Canada: Implications for L-band satellite validation , 2015 .

[24]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part II: Dielectric Mixing Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  R. Nolz,et al.  Evaluating a sensor setup with respect to near-surface soil water monitoring and determination of in-situ water retention functions , 2017 .