Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades?

Summary 1Ecologists have long recognized that plants occurring in areas of low rainfall or soil nutrients tend to have smaller leaves than those in more favourable regions. 2Working with a large data set (690 species at 47 sites spread widely through south-east Australia) for which this reduction has been described previously, we investigated the morphology of leaf size reduction, asking whether any patterns observed were consistent across evolutionary lineages or between environmental gradients. 3Leaf length, width and surface areas were measured; leaf traits such as pubescence or lobing were also scored qualitatively. There was no correlation between soil phosphorus and rainfall across sites. Further, there was no evidence that pubescence, lobing or other traits assessed served as alternatives to reduction of leaf size at the low ends of either environmental gradient. 4Leaf size reduction occurred through many combinations of change in leaf width and length, even within lineages. Thus consistent patterns in the method of leaf size reduction were not found, although broad similarities between rainfall and soil P gradients were apparent.

[1]  D. Rodríguez,et al.  Plant leaf area expansion and assimilate production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growing under low phosphorus conditions , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[2]  J. Obeso.  The induction of spinescence in European holly leaves by browsing ungulates , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[3]  R. Cowling,et al.  Convergence in vegetation structure in the mediterranean communities of California, Chile and South Africa , 1980, Vegetatio.

[4]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient‐poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span , 2002 .

[5]  Jacob McC. Overton,et al.  Shifts in trait‐combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients , 2000 .

[6]  M. Westoby,et al.  A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages , 2000 .

[7]  Mark Westoby,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES IN LEAF STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY, COMPARING RAINFALL AND SOIL NUTRIENT GRADIENTS , 1999 .

[8]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[9]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Irradiance Capture and Avoidance in Semi-arid Environments Assessed with a Crown Architecture Model , 1999 .

[10]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. McKey,et al.  Corner's rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf–stem allometry , 1998 .

[12]  Elizabeth A. Kellogg,et al.  An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants , 1998 .

[13]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Physiological and morphological variation in Metrosideros polymorpha, a dominant Hawaiian tree species, along an altitudinal gradient: the role of phenotypic plasticity , 1998, Oecologia.

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Intraspecific variation of leaf pubescence and drought response in Encelia farinosa associated with contrasting desert environments , 1997 .

[16]  J. Lawton,et al.  The Impact of Leaf Shape on the Feeding Preference of Insect Herbivores: Experimental and Field Studies with Capsella and Phyllotreta , 1996 .

[17]  J. Escudero,et al.  Adaptability of leaves of Cistus ladanifer to widely varying environmental conditions , 1996 .

[18]  S. Halloy,et al.  Comparative leaf morphology spectra of plant communities in New Zealand, the Andes and the European Alps , 1996 .

[19]  C. Stone,et al.  Leaf dynamics and insect herbivory in a Eucalyptus camaldulensis forest under moisture stress , 1995 .

[20]  J. A. Wolfe.  PALEOCLIMATIC ESTIMATES FROM TERTIARY LEAF ASSEMBLAGES , 1995 .

[21]  P. Schuepp,et al.  Tansley Review No. 59 Leaf boundary layers. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[22]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[23]  P. Reich.  Reconciling apparent discrepancies among studies relating life span, structure and function of leaves in contrasting plant life forms and climates: the blind men and the elephant retold' , 1993 .

[24]  Pamela Hall,et al.  Comparisons of structure among mixed dipterocarp forests of north-western Borneo , 1992 .

[25]  G. Harden.  Flora of New South Wales , 1992 .

[26]  A. Grafen.  The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression , 1992 .

[27]  J. Lawton,et al.  Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape , 1991 .

[28]  I. Baillie,et al.  Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. , 1990 .

[29]  A. Grafen.  The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  W. Baethgen,et al.  A manual colorimetric procedure for measuring ammonium nitrogen in soil and plant Kjeldahl digests , 1989 .

[31]  P. Grubb.  Plant Populations and Vegetation in Relation to Habitat, Disturbance and Competition: Problems of Generalization , 1985 .

[32]  H. Mooney,et al.  Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics , 1984, Tasks for vegetation Science.

[33]  T. Givnish.  Leaf and Canopy Adaptations in Tropical Forests , 1984 .

[34]  P. White.  Corner's Rules in Eastern Deciduous Trees: Allometry and Its Implications for the Adaptive Architecture of Trees , 1983 .

[35]  P. C. Miller,et al.  Canopy Structure of Mediterranean-Type Shrubs in Relation to Heat and Moisture , 1983 .

[36]  J. Ehleringer.  THE INFLUENCE OF WATER STRESS AND TEMPERATURE ON LEAF PUBESCENCE DEVELOPMENT IN ENCELIA FARINOSA , 1982 .

[37]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[38]  G. E. Dolph,et al.  Variation in Leaf Size with Respect to Climate in the Tropics of the Western Hemisphere , 1980 .

[39]  T. Givnish.  On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Form , 1979 .

[40]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[41]  P. Nobel,et al.  Influences of Seasonal Changes in Leaf Morphology on Water-Use Efficiency For Three Desert Broadleaf Shrubs , 1977 .

[42]  G. E. Dolph.  The Effect of Different Calculational Techniques on the Estimation of Leaf Area and the Construction of Leaf Size Distributions , 1977 .

[43]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Sizes and Shapes of Liane Leaves , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[44]  S. Vogel.  Convective Cooling at Low Airspeeds and the Shapes of Broad Leaves , 1970 .

[45]  L. Webb.  Environmental Relationships of the Structural Types of Australian Rain Forest Vegetation , 1968 .

[46]  N. Beadle.  Soil Phosphate and Its Role in Molding Segments of the Australian Flora and Vegetation, with Special Reference to Xeromorphy and Sclerophylly , 1966 .

[47]  N. Beadle.  Soil Phosphate and the Delimitation of Plant Communities in Eastern Australia , 1954 .

[48]  J. S. Beard,et al.  The Natural Vegetation of Trinidad. , 1947 .

[49]  G. Stebbins.  The Classification of Flowering Plants , 1982, Nature.

[50]  BY D. F. PARKHURSTt.  OPTIMAL LEAF SIZE IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT * , 2022 .