Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences

Introduction Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery. Results Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and ‘socially-distanced’ services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants’ accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services.

[1]  C. Mercer,et al.  ‘Stay at home …’: exploring the impact of the COVID-19 public health response on sexual behaviour and health service use among men who have sex with men: findings from a large online survey in the UK , 2021, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[2]  C. Mercer,et al.  Methodology of Natsal-COVID Wave 1: a large, quasi-representative survey with qualitative follow-up measuring the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health in Britain , 2021, Wellcome open research.

[3]  J. Gibbs,et al.  P179 Access to, and usage of, online postal sexually transmitted infection self-sampling services: a scoping review , 2021, Poster presentations.

[4]  Cheng Wang,et al.  P174 A novel nomogram to identify MSM at high risk of syphilis infection in China: Results from a Serial Cross-Sectional Study , 2021, Poster presentations.

[5]  J. Hocking,et al.  P293 The potential role of masturbation in transmitting Neisseria gonorrhoeae at multiple anatomical sites among men who have sex with men , 2021, Poster presentations.

[6]  J. Gibbs,et al.  P296 Do GBMSM’s preferences for in-person, telephone or digital sexual healthcare vary according to health concerns and symptoms? A cross-sectional survey , 2021, Poster presentations.

[7]  C. Mercer,et al.  Initial Impacts of COVID-19 on Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Use and Unmet Need in Britain: Findings from a Large, Quasi-Representative Survey (Natsal-COVID) , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  J. Harden,et al.  Women’s experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  C. Llewellyn,et al.  Sexual healthcare professionals’ views on the rapid provision of remote services at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study , 2021, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[10]  B. Kaneshiro,et al.  "It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough": a qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care. , 2021, Contraception.

[11]  Ruth Lewis,et al.  Disrupted prevention: condom and contraception access and use among young adults during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. An online survey , 2021, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

[12]  E. McKinlay,et al.  Access to sexual healthcare during New Zealand’s COVID-19 lockdown: cross-sectional online survey of 15–24-year-olds in a high deprivation region , 2021, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

[13]  P. Lohr,et al.  Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no‐test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  Karen McCabe,et al.  Telemedicine medical abortion at home under 12 weeks’ gestation: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

[15]  K. Church,et al.  Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine during Covid-19: analysis of patient-reported outcomes , 2021, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

[16]  P. Flowers,et al.  How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and bloodborne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy , 2020, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[17]  N. Buddle,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 on access to sexual health clinics for patients 18 years old and under , 2021 .

[18]  J. Friedland,et al.  “It's a life you're playing with”: A qualitative study on experiences of NHS maternity services among undocumented migrant women in England , 2020, Social science & medicine.

[19]  P. Sasieni,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 disruption to cervical cancer screening in England on excess diagnoses. , 2020, medRxiv.

[20]  R. Moresky,et al.  Centring sexual and reproductive health and justice in the global COVID-19 response , 2020, The Lancet.

[21]  T. Dickinson,et al.  Barriers to older adults seeking sexual health advice and treatment: A scoping review. , 2020, International journal of nursing studies.

[22]  C. Brett,et al.  Psychosocial and sexual factors associated with recent sexual health clinic attendance and HIV testing among trans people in the UK , 2019, BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health.

[23]  K. Gemzell‐Danielsson,et al.  Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review , 2019, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  Sóley S. Bender,et al.  Content analysis: A review of perceived barriers to sexual and reproductive health services by young people , 2013, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[25]  N. Low,et al.  The experiences of ethnic minority MSM using NHS sexual health clinics in Britain , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[26]  M. Kirkman,et al.  Young people's views on the potential use of telemedicine consultations for sexual health: results of a national survey , 2011, BMC infectious diseases.

[27]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .