Healthcare Data Safe Havens: Towards a Logical Architecture and Experiment Automation

In computing science, much attention has been paid to generic methods for sharing data in secure infrastructures. These sorts of methods and infrastructures are, of course, necessary for sharing healthcare data. The authors are, however, a long way away from being able to realise the potential of medical and healthcare data to support the sorts of extensive, data-intensive experiments being demanded by precision and stratified medicine. A key architectural problem remaining to be solved is how to maintain control of patient data within the governance of local data jurisdictions, while also allowing these jurisdictions to engage with experiment designs that (because of the need to scale to large population sizes) may require analyses across several jurisdictions. This study provides a snapshot of architectural work underway to provide a clear, effective structure of data safe havens within jurisdictions. It then describes how formally specified experiment designs can be used to enable jurisdictions to work together on experiments that no single jurisdiction could tackle alone. The authors’ current work relates to two jurisdictions (in Scotland and in Italy), but the architecture and methods are general across similar jurisdictions.

[1]  Mark J. Taylor,et al.  Information Governance as a Force for Good? Lessons to be Learnt from Care.data , 2014 .

[2]  Stephen Pavis,et al.  Unleashing the power of administrative health data: the Scottish model. , 2015, Public health research & practice.

[3]  Charles Safran,et al.  Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[4]  Sumio Sugano,et al.  International code of conduct for genomic and health-related data sharing , 2014, The HUGO Journal.

[5]  P. Donnan,et al.  Construction of a linked health and social care database resource – lessons on process, content and culture , 2015, Informatics for health & social care.

[6]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  Data Safe Havens and Trust: Toward a Common Understanding of Trusted Research Platforms for Governing Secure and Ethical Health Research , 2016, JMIR medical informatics.

[7]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Simon Thompson,et al.  A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) Gateway: A privacy-protecting remote access system for health-related research and evaluation☆ , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[9]  Ellen Lynch,et al.  Barriers and Solutions to Linking and Using Health and Social Care Data in Scotland , 2015 .

[10]  Anthony J. Brookes,et al.  Data Safe Havens in health research and healthcare , 2015, Bioinform..

[11]  R. Lyons,et al.  The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation , 2009, BMC health services research.

[12]  Bartha Maria Knoppers,et al.  Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data , 2014, The HUGO Journal.

[13]  David Stuart Robertson,et al.  A Lightweight Coordination Calculus for Agent Systems , 2004, DALT.

[14]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  On moving targets and magic bullets: Can the UK lead the way with responsible data linkage for health research? , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  David Stuart Robertson,et al.  Lightweight Coordination Calculus for Agent Systems: Retrospective and Prospective , 2011, DALT.