Effect of femoral head size on the wear of metal on metal bearings in total hip replacements under adverse edge-loading conditions

Abstract Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings have shown low-wear rates under standard hip simulator conditions; however, retrieval studies have shown large variations in wear rates and mechanisms. High-wear in vivo has caused catastrophic complications and has been associated with steep cup-inclination angle (rotational malpositioning). However, increasing the cup-inclination angle in vitro has not replicated the increases in wear to the same extent as those observed in retrievals. Clinically relevant wear rates, patterns, and particles were observed in vitro for ceramic-on-ceramic bearings when microseparation (translational malpositioning) conditions were introduced into the gait cycle. In the present study, 28 and 36-mm MoM bearings were investigated under adverse conditions. Increasing the cup angle from 45° to 65° resulted in a significant increase in the wear rate of the 28 mm bearings. However, for the 36 mm bearings, head-rim contact did not occur under the steep cup-angle condition, and the wear rate did not increase. The introduction of microseparation to the gait cycle significantly increased the wear rate of the MoM bearings. Cup angle and head size did not influence the wear rate under microseparation conditions. This study indicated that high-in vivo wear rates were associated with edge loading due to rotational malpositioning such as high-cup-inclination angle and translational malpositioning that could occur due to several surgical factors. Translational malpositioning had a more dominant effect on the wear rate. Preclinical simulation testing should be undertaken with translational and rotational malpositioning conditions as well as standard walking cycle conditions defined by the ISO standard. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2013.

[1]  J. Fisher,et al.  The effect of cup orientation and coverage on contact mechanics and range of motion of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  J Fisher,et al.  Bioengineering reasons for the failure of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: an engineer's perspective. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  P. Cann,et al.  Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  Mazen Al-Hajjar,et al.  Effect of cup inclination angle during microseparation and rim loading on the wear of BIOLOX® delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[5]  J. Fisher,et al.  M-21 Ceramic-on-Metal Hip Replacements: A Novel Bearing Combination , 2010 .

[6]  H. Gill,et al.  Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  J. Henckel,et al.  The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  John Fisher,et al.  High Cup Angle and Microseparation Increase the Wear of Hip Surface Replacements , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  J. Shelton,et al.  Influence of cup orientation on the wear performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  A. Counsell,et al.  A groin mass caused by metal particle debris after hip resurfacing. , 2008, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[11]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Clicking and squeaking: in vivo correlation of sound and separation for different bearing surfaces. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  P. Campbell,et al.  Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  J. Fisher,et al.  Effect of bearing size on the long-term wear, wear debris, and ion levels of large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements-An in vitro study. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[14]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  D W Murray,et al.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  John Fisher,et al.  THE 2007 OTTO AUFRANC AWARD: Ceramic-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative In Vitro and In Vivo Study , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  S Affatato,et al.  Larger Diameter Bearings Reduce Wear in Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  H. Amstutz,et al.  The John Charnley Award: A Study of Implant Failure in Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasties , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  P. Campbell,et al.  Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: Effects of implant design and implantation time , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[21]  D. Howie,et al.  The long-term wear of retrieved McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  C. Rieker,et al.  Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  John Fisher,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearing wear with different swing phase loads. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[24]  Kengo Yamamoto,et al.  Stripe wear rates in alumina THR--comparison of microseparation simulator study with retrieved implants. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[25]  John Fisher,et al.  Severe wear and fracture of zirconia heads against alumina inserts in hip simulator studies with microseparation. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  J. Fisher,et al.  Long-term wear of ceramic matrix composite materials for hip prostheses under severe swing phase microseparation. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[27]  Jorge A Ochoa,et al.  In Vivo Comparison of Hip Separation After Metal-on-Metal or Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  M. Naito,et al.  Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  J Fisher,et al.  Alumina-alumina artificial hip joints. Part I: a histological analysis and characterisation of wear debris by laser capture microdissection of tissues retrieved at revision. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[30]  J Fisher,et al.  Alumina-alumina artificial hip joints. Part II: characterisation of the wear debris from in vitro hip joint simulations. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[31]  B. Jolles,et al.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  J Fisher,et al.  Long-term wear of HIPed alumina on alumina bearings for THR under microseparation conditions , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[33]  J. Fisher,et al.  Wear of HIPed and non-HIPed alumina-alumina hip joints under standard and severe simulator testing conditions. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[34]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparative analysis of two different types of alumina-alumina hip prosthesis retrieved for aseptic loosening. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  D Dowson,et al.  New joints for the Millennium: Wear control in total replacement hip joints , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[37]  J Fisher,et al.  The influence of acetabular cup angle on the wear of “BIOLOX Forte” alumina ceramic bearing couples in a hip joint simulator , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[38]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of simulator kinematics on the wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[39]  J Fisher,et al.  Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[40]  D Dowson,et al.  A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[41]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  J Fisher,et al.  Analysis of retrieved alumina ceramic components from Mittelmeier total hip prostheses. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[43]  K. An,et al.  Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[44]  S. Kelley High hip center in revision arthroplasty. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[45]  M. Semlitsch,et al.  Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  B. Morrey Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings , 2009 .

[47]  J. Fisher,et al.  Changes in the contact area during the bedding-in wear of different sizes of metal on metal hip prostheses. , 2004, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[48]  J Fisher,et al.  Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. , 2001, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[49]  C. Rieker,et al.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.