A robust optimality criteria procedure for cross-sectional optimization of frame structures with multiple frequency limits

Abstract An efficient optimality criteria (OC) method is presented for cross-sectional optimization of two-dimensional frame structures supporting a sizeable amount of nonstructural mass and subjected to multiple natural frequency constraints and minimum and maximum gauge restrictions. The iterative method involves alternately satisfying the constraints (scaling) and applying the Kuhn-Tucker (optimality) condition (resizing). This being the case, a criterion, which uses previous scaled designs to ‘adaptively’ tune the step size, is established. As the step size is tuned, the convergence rate is decreased. Hence a modified Aitken's accelerator, which extrapolates from previous scaled designs to obtain an improved one, is used. When the frequency constraints are to be satisfied, the sizing variables (cross-sectional areas) are uniformly scaled to the constraint surfaces using a closed-form formulation. This exact formulation is introduced for the first time in the open literature. Design examples are presented to demonstrate the method. The method is also used to qualitatively survey the convergence of OC recursive relations compositely used to resize and to evaluate the Lagrange multipliers. The method is robust, as it quickly dissolves the (sometimes violent) oscillations of scaled weights in the iteration history. Also, it eliminates the need for adjustments of internal parameters during the redesign phase.

[1]  R. Canfield,et al.  Structural optimization of framed structures using generalized optimality criteria , 1989 .

[2]  V. Venkayya,et al.  Comparison of Optimality Criteria Algorithms for Minimum Weight Design of Structures , 1978 .

[3]  N. Khot Optimality Criterion Methods in Structural Optimization. , 1982 .

[4]  N. S. Khot,et al.  Optimization of structures with multiple frequency constraints , 1985 .

[5]  L. Berke,et al.  Comparison of Optimality Criteria Algorithms for Minimum Weight Design of Structures , 1978 .

[6]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[7]  O. G. McGee,et al.  An adaptive procedure for stabilizing convergence quality in frequency‐constrained design optimization of bar structures supporting non‐structural mass , 1991 .

[8]  Vipperla B Venkayya,et al.  Aerospace Structures Design on Computers , 1989 .

[9]  K. D. Willmert,et al.  An efficient optimality criterion method for natural frequency constrained structures , 1981 .

[10]  V. Venkayya Design of optimum structures , 1971 .

[11]  W. A. Thornton,et al.  A new optimality criterion method for large scale structures , 1978 .

[12]  W. A. Thornton,et al.  Optimality Criterion Techniques Applied to Mechanical Design , 1978 .

[13]  Daniel M. Brown,et al.  Structural Optimization by Nonlinear Programming , 1966 .

[14]  Claude Fleury,et al.  Generalized Optimality Criteria for Frequency Constraints, Buckling Constraints and Bending Elements. , 1979 .

[15]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Structural optimization with frequency constraints , 1987 .

[16]  Mohsin R. Khan Optimality criterion techniques applied to frames having general cross-sectional relationships , 1984 .

[17]  V. B. Venkayya,et al.  Structural optimization: A review and some recommendations , 1978 .

[18]  Enrique I. Tabak,et al.  Optimality Criteria Method for Building Frames , 1981 .

[19]  V. B. Venkayya,et al.  A Compound Scaling Algorithm for Mathematical Optimization , 1989 .

[20]  L. Berke,et al.  Structural optimization using optimality criteria methods , 1984 .