Coaching Intensity, Adherence to Essential Birth Practices, and Health Outcomes in the BetterBirth Trial in Uttar Pradesh, India

Frequent coaching was associated with increased adherence to evidence-based essential birth practices among birth attendants but not with improved maternal and perinatal health outcomes in the BetterBirth Trial, which assessed the impact of a complex intervention to implement the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist. To promote sustainable behavior change, future coaching-based interventions may need to explore cost-effective, feasible mechanisms for providing more frequent coaching delivered with high coverage among health care workers for longer durations. Frequent coaching was associated with increased adherence to evidence-based essential birth practices among birth attendants but not with improved maternal and perinatal health outcomes in the BetterBirth Trial, which assessed the impact of a complex intervention to implement the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist. To promote sustainable behavior change, future coaching-based interventions may need to explore cost-effective, feasible mechanisms for providing more frequent coaching delivered with high coverage among health care workers for longer durations. ABSTRACT Background: Coaching can improve the quality of care in primary-level birth facilities and promote birth attendant adherence to essential birth practices (EBPs) that reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. The intensity of coaching needed to promote and sustain behavior change is unknown. We investigated the relationship between coaching intensity, EBP adherence, and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using data from the BetterBirth Trial, which assessed the impact of a complex, coaching-based implementation of the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist in Uttar Pradesh, India. Methods: For each birth, we defined multiple coaching intensity metrics, including coaching frequency (coaching visits per month), cumulative coaching (total coaching visits accrued during the intervention), and scheduling adherence (coaching delivered as scheduled). We considered coaching delivered at both facility and birth attendant levels. We assessed the association between coaching intensity and birth attendant adherence to 18 EBPs and with maternal and perinatal health outcomes using regression models. Results: Coaching frequency was associated with modestly increased EBP adherence. Delivering 6 coaching visits per month to facilities was associated with adherence to 1.3 additional EBPs (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.6, 1.9). High-frequency coaching delivered with high coverage among birth attendants was associated with greater improvements: providing 70% of birth attendants at a facility with at least 1 visit per month was associated with adherence to 2.0 additional EBPs (95% CI=1.0, 2.9). Neither cumulative coaching nor scheduling adherence was associated with EBP adherence. Coaching was generally not associated with health outcomes, possibly due to the small magnitude of association between coaching and EBP adherence. Conclusions: Frequent coaching may promote behavior change, especially if delivered with high coverage among birth attendants. However, the effects of coaching were modest and did not persist over time, suggesting that future coaching-based interventions should explore providing frequent coaching for longer periods.

[1]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Nurses' and auxiliary nurse midwives' adherence to essential birth practices with peer coaching in Uttar Pradesh, India: a secondary analysis of the BetterBirth trial , 2020, Implementation Science.

[2]  S. Prasad,et al.  Conceptual Framework of Mentoring in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Advance Global Health , 2018, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[3]  Julie M. Herlihy,et al.  Population-based rates, timing, and causes of maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country prospective cohort study , 2019 .

[4]  M. Patabendige,et al.  Experience with a context-specific modified WHO safe childbirth checklist at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[5]  D. Peters,et al.  Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review , 2018, The Lancet. Global health.

[6]  A. Gawande,et al.  Integration of the Opportunity‐Ability‐Motivation behavior change framework into a coaching‐based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program in India , 2018, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  M. Kruk,et al.  Can India’s primary care facilities deliver? A cross-sectional assessment of the Indian public health system’s capacity for basic delivery and newborn services , 2018, BMJ Open.

[8]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Outcomes of a Coaching-based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India , 2018, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest.

[9]  L. Hirschhorn,et al.  Effectiveness of a WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Coaching-based intervention on the availability of Essential Birth Supplies in Uttar Pradesh, India , 2018, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  L. Marquez,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of three methods of disseminating information to improve medical male circumcision in Uganda , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  E. Tuyishime,et al.  Implementing the World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist in a district Hospital in Rwanda: a pre- and post-intervention study , 2018, Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology.

[12]  C. Bannerman,et al.  Accelerating newborn survival in Ghana through a low-dose, high-frequency health worker training approach: a cluster randomized trial , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[13]  M. Pai,et al.  Surrogate endpoints in global health research: still searching for killer apps and silver bullets? , 2018, BMJ Global Health.

[14]  L. Hirschhorn,et al.  Beyond coverage: improving the quality of antenatal care delivery through integrated mentorship and quality improvement at health centers in rural Rwanda , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[15]  R. Islam,et al.  Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: a pre-post evaluation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist at a hospital in Bangladesh , 2017, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[16]  A. Gawande,et al.  Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India , 2017, Trials.

[17]  L. Hirschhorn,et al.  Implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: lessons learnt on a quality improvement initiative to improve mother and newborn care at Gobabis District Hospital, Namibia , 2017, BMJ open quality.

[18]  A. Gawande,et al.  The BetterBirth Program: Pursuing Effective Adoption and Sustained Use of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Through Coaching-Based Implementation in Uttar Pradesh, India , 2017, Global Health: Science and Practice.

[19]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  The BetterBirth Program: Pursuing Effective Adoption and Sustained Use of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Through Coaching-Based Implementation in Uttar Pradesh, India , 2016, Global Health: Science and Practice.

[20]  Marleen Temmerman,et al.  National, regional, and global levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015 with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group , 2015, The Lancet.

[21]  S. Balasubramaniam,et al.  Effectiveness of the WHO SCC on improving adherence to essential practices during childbirth, in resource constrained settings , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[22]  C. Ronsmans,et al.  The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care , 2016, The Lancet.

[23]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Gawande,et al.  Learning before leaping: integration of an adaptive study design process prior to initiation of BetterBirth, a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India , 2015, Implementation Science.

[25]  E. Svensen,et al.  Frequent brief on-site simulation training and reduction in 24-h neonatal mortality--an educational intervention study. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[26]  M. Patabendige,et al.  Implementation of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program at a tertiary care setting in Sri Lanka: a developing country experience , 2015, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[27]  J. Nagpal,et al.  Widespread non‐adherence to evidence‐based maternity care guidelines: a population‐based cluster randomised household survey , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  Jai K Das,et al.  Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? , 2014, The Lancet.

[29]  L. Hirschhorn,et al.  Mentoring and quality improvement strengthen integrated management of childhood illness implementation in rural Rwanda , 2014, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[30]  H. Carnahan,et al.  Peer-coaching with health care professionals: What is the current status of the literature and what are the key components necessary in peer-coaching? A scoping review , 2014, Medical teacher.

[31]  T. Afolaranmi,et al.  Supportive supervision: an effective intervention in achieving high quality malaria case management at primary health care level in Jos, Nigeria. , 2013, Annals of African medicine.

[32]  J. Perlman,et al.  A one-day "Helping Babies Breathe" course improves simulated performance but not clinical management of neonates. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[33]  W. Berry,et al.  Designing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program to improve quality of care at childbirth , 2013, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[34]  A. De Costa,et al.  India’s Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality? , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  Rajesri Govindaraju,et al.  Physicians' Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Model Development Using Ability - Motivation - Opportunity Framework , 2013, ICT-EurAsia.

[36]  J. Sabatine,et al.  Mentoring and Coaching: A Model Guiding Professional Nurses to Executive Success , 2012, The Journal of nursing administration.

[37]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Improving Quality of Care for Maternal and Newborn Health: Prospective Pilot Study of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[39]  M. Ory,et al.  The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium. , 2010, American journal of health behavior.

[40]  Alexander K Rowe,et al.  A multifaceted intervention to improve health worker adherence to integrated management of childhood illness guidelines in Benin. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[41]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Implementation Science BioMed Central Debate A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity , 2007 .

[42]  A. McCaw-Binns,et al.  Are skilled birth attendants really skilled? A measurement method, some disturbing results and a potential way forward. , 2007, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[43]  J. Stanback,et al.  Improving adherence to family planning guidelines in Kenya: an experiment. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[44]  G. Burnham,et al.  Improving facility-based care for sick children in Uganda: training is not enough. , 2005, Health policy and planning.

[45]  Cesar G Victora,et al.  How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? , 2005, The Lancet.

[46]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[47]  Jan Mainz,et al.  Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[48]  Margot Pearson,et al.  Research Training and Supervision Development , 2002 .

[49]  Charles H. Todd,et al.  The impact of supervision on stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Health policy and planning.

[50]  B. Loevinsohn,et al.  Improving primary health care through systematic supervision: a controlled field trial. , 1995, Health policy and planning.

[51]  N. Jewell,et al.  Hypothesis testing of regression parameters in semiparametric generalized linear models for cluster correlated data , 1990 .

[52]  R. Simon,et al.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[53]  Marise Reis Freitas,et al.  [Assessment of adherence to the Safe Childbirth Checklist in a public maternity hospital in Northeast Brazil]. , 2017, Cadernos de saude publica.

[54]  S. Warren,et al.  Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. , 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[55]  J. Chalker,et al.  Improving antibiotic prescribing in Hai Phong Province, Viet Nam: the "antibiotic-dose" indicator. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[56]  S Wacholder,et al.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.