A review of climate geoengineering appraisals

Deliberate large‐scale interventions in the Earth's climate system—known collectively as ‘geoengineering’—have been proposed in order to moderate anthropogenic climate change. Amidst a backdrop of many ways of framing the supposed normative rationales for or against their use, geoengineering proposals are undergoing serious consideration. To support decision makers in the multitude of governance considerations a growing number of appraisals are being conducted to evaluate their pros and cons. Appraisals of geoengineering are critically reviewed here for the first time using a systematic literature search and screen strategy. Substantial variability between different appraisals' outputs originates from usually hidden framing effects relating to contextual and methodological choices. Geoengineering has largely been appraised in contextual isolation, ignoring the wider portfolio of options for tackling climate change—spanning mitigation and adaptation—and creating an artificial choice between geoengineering proposals. Most existing appraisal methods do not adequately respond to the post‐normal scientific context in which geoengineering resides and show a strong emphasis on closed and exclusive ‘expert‐analytic’ techniques. These and other framing effects invariably focus—or close down—upon particular sets of problem definition, values, assumptions, and courses of action. This produces a limited range of decision options which seem preferable given those framing effects that are privileged, and could ultimately contribute to the closing down of governance commitments. Emergent closure around particular geoengineering proposals is identified and argued to be premature given the need for more anticipatory, responsible, and reflexive forms of governing what is an ‘upstream’ domain of scientific and technological development. WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:597–615. doi: 10.1002/wcc.197 This article is categorized under: Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making

[1]  Charles D. Keeling,et al.  The Concentration and Isotopic Abundances of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere , 1960 .

[2]  M. Hulme,et al.  Beyond the Tipping Point: Understanding Perceptions of Abrupt Climate Change and Their Implications , 2011 .

[3]  T. Merrill.  Golden Rules for Transboundary Pollution , 1997 .

[4]  David W. Keith,et al.  Public understanding of solar radiation management , 2011, Environmental Research Letters.

[5]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Earth systems engineering and management , 2001, Nature.

[6]  A. Ryaboshapko,et al.  Comparative analysis of geo-engineering approaches to climate stabilization , 2009 .

[7]  M. James C. Crabbe,et al.  Modelling effects of geoengineering options in response to climate change and global warming: Implications for coral reefs , 2009, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[8]  P. Irvine,et al.  ‘Geoengineering'–taking Control of Our Planet's Climate , 2009, Science progress.

[9]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[10]  S. Jevrejeva,et al.  Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Maccracken.  Geoengineering: Worthy of Cautious Evaluation? , 2006 .

[12]  J. H. Ludwig,et al.  Climate Modification by Atmospheric Aerosols , 1967, Science.

[13]  P. Crutzen.  Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[14]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[15]  D. Venables,et al.  Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January- March 2010 , 2010 .

[16]  Hugh E. Willoughby,et al.  Project STORMFURY: a scientific chronicle 1962-1983 , 1985 .

[17]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions , 2007 .

[18]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[19]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  A review of climate geoengineering proposals , 2011 .

[20]  C. Marchetti.  On geoengineering and the CO2 problem , 1977 .

[21]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Ecosystem Impacts of Geoengineering: A Review for Developing a Science Plan , 2011, AMBIO.

[22]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multicriteria Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop , 2001 .

[23]  Joseph W. Boardman,et al.  The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) imaging spectrometer for lunar science: Instrument description, calibration, on‐orbit measurements, science data calibration and on‐orbit validation , 2011 .

[24]  D. Humphreys.  Smoke and Mirrors: Some Reflections on the Science and Politics of Geoengineering , 2011 .

[25]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[26]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[27]  S. Barrett.  The Incredible Economics of Geoengineering , 2008 .

[28]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[29]  D. Sarewitz.  The voice of science: let's agree to disagree , 2011, Nature.

[30]  Alan Robock,et al.  20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea , 2008 .

[31]  D. Bodansky.  May we engineer the climate? , 1996 .

[32]  John Virgoe,et al.  International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change , 2009 .

[33]  L. Chapman,et al.  Engineering geo‐engineering , 2011 .

[34]  Andy Ridgwell,et al.  Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering , 2011 .

[35]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering , 2011 .

[36]  K. Keller,et al.  The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering , 2009 .

[37]  Dan Jones.  Psychology. A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. , 2010, Science.

[38]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .

[39]  Leo Dobes,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: ignorance or negligence? , 2010 .

[40]  PHILIP W. BOYD,et al.  Ranking geo-engineering schemes , 2008 .

[41]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud , 2011 .

[42]  T. Leisner,et al.  Climate engineering: A critical review of approaches to modify the global energy balance , 2009 .

[43]  Barbara Goss Levi.  Will desperate climates call for desperate geoengineering measures , 2008 .

[44]  Matthew Kearnes,et al.  Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences? , 2005 .

[45]  F. Hayek.  New studies in philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas , 1978 .

[46]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberating Competence , 2008 .

[47]  David W. Keith,et al.  a serious look at geoengineering , 1992 .

[48]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops , 2011 .

[49]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[50]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications , 2010 .

[51]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[52]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Climate change 2007: Lifting the taboo on adaptation , 2007, Nature.

[53]  Todd A. Crane,et al.  Beyond the “fit”: introducing climate forecasts among organic farmers in Georgia (United States) , 2011 .

[54]  David H. Guston,et al.  Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp , 2008, Nature.