Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of grade.

PURPOSE A substantial proportion of the propulsive forces required for uphill skiing are generated from the upper body, but no study has systematically examined poling forces at different slopes. In the present experiment, poling forces and timing were examined during roller skiing on 2.1% and 5.1% uphills. METHODS Nine highly skilled cross-country skiers roller skied at paced submaximal and at maximal speeds using the V1 skate (V1) and double pole (DP) techniques. Poling forces and timing were measured with piezoelectric transducers. RESULTS Peak force (PF), average force (AF) and average force over the entire cycle (ACF) were significantly greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade with both techniques. Values for the ratio of V1 to DP did not differ between the two grades for PF, AF, and ACF but tended to increase with velocity for both techniques. With both V1 and DP, upper body recovery time was shorter (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade, and cycle rate was greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that 1) the relative demands on the upper body with V1 compared with DP were similar between the two grades, and 2) the responses to an elevation in grade of increased poling forces, shortened poling recovery times, and increased cycle rate are comparable to the responses to an increase in speed.

[1]  P. Clifford,et al.  Delta efficiency of uphill roller skiing with the double pole and diagonal stride techniques. , 1995, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[2]  F Celentano,et al.  Mechanical aspects of rowing. , 1974, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  M. Boulay,et al.  Propulsive and gliding phases in four cross-country skiing techniques. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  M D Hoffman,et al.  In-line skating: physiological responses and comparison with roller skiing. , 1992, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  G. Borg Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. , 2019, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  G A Smith,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of cross-country skiing techniques. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  D. King,et al.  Effect of slope variation and skating technique on velocity in cross-country skiing. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  P. Komi,et al.  Preloading of the thrust phase in cross-country skiing. , 1987, International journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Edward C. Frederick,et al.  Measurement of Skier-Generated Forces during Roller-Ski Skating , 1995 .

[10]  P. Clifford,et al.  Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of technique and speed. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.