Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) consists of multiple copies of ≈30 different proteins [nucleoporins (nups)], forming a channel in the nuclear envelope that mediates macromolecular transport between the cytosol and the nucleus. With <5% of the nup residues currently available in experimentally determined structures, little is known about the detailed structure of the NPC. Here, we use a combined computational and biochemical approach to assign folds for ≈95% of the residues in the yeast and vertebrate nups. These fold assignments suggest an underlying simplicity in the composition and modularity in the architecture of all eukaryotic NPCs. The simplicity in NPC composition is reflected in the presence of only eight fold types, with the three most frequent folds accounting for ≈85% of the residues. The modularity in NPC architecture is reflected in its hierarchical and symmetrical organization that partitions the predicted nup folds into three groups: the transmembrane group containing transmembrane helices and a cadherin fold, the central scaffold group containing β-propeller and α-solenoid folds, and the peripheral FG group containing predominantly the FG repeats and the coiled-coil fold. Moreover, similarities between structures in coated vesicles and those in the NPC support our prior hypothesis for their common evolutionary origin in a progenitor protocoatomer. The small number of predicted fold types in the NPC and their internal symmetries suggest that the bulk of the NPC structure has evolved through extensive motif and gene duplication from a simple precursor set of only a few proteins.

[1]  P. Jallepalli,et al.  Ufd2, a Novel Autoantigen in Scleroderma, Regulates Sister Chromatid Separation , 2004, Cell cycle.

[2]  E. Hurt,et al.  Yeast genetics to dissect the nuclear pore complex and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. , 1997, Annual review of genetics.

[3]  David Reverter,et al.  Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO–RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex , 2005, Nature.

[4]  V. Hu The Cell Cycle , 1994, GWUMC Department of Biochemistry Annual Spring Symposia.

[5]  Johannes Söding,et al.  Protein homology detection by HMM?CHMM comparison , 2005, Bioinform..

[6]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  A census of protein repeats. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Celia A Schiffer,et al.  Lack of synergy for inhibitors targeting a multi‐drug‐resistant HIV‐1 protease , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  S. R. Wente,et al.  Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[9]  F. Förster,et al.  Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Dynamics Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2004, Science.

[10]  Bernard F. Buxton,et al.  The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder , 2004, Bioinform..

[11]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  Improving fold recognition without folds. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  G. Blobel,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[14]  B. Chait,et al.  Components of Coated Vesicles and Nuclear Pore Complexes Share a Common Molecular Architecture , 2004, PLoS biology.

[15]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[16]  M. Hodel,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of the autoproteolytic, nuclear pore-targeting domain of the human nucleoporin Nup98. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[17]  U Aebi,et al.  The nuclear pore complex: from molecular architecture to functional dynamics. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  P. Grandi,et al.  A new subclass of nucleoporins that functionally interact with nuclear pore protein NSP1. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[20]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  B. Chait,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  E. Costas,et al.  Architecture and evolution of dinoflagellate chromosomes: an enigmatic origin , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[23]  T. Smith,et al.  Analysis of the physical properties and molecular modeling of Sec13: A WD repeat protein involved in vesicular traffic. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[24]  E. Conti,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic transport enters the atomic age. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  EVA: evaluation of protein structure prediction servers , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Keith R. Johnson,et al.  Cadherins as modulators of cellular phenotype. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  W. Pearson Empirical statistical estimates for sequence similarity searches. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  S. Harrison,et al.  Molecular model for a complete clathrin lattice from electron cryomicroscopy , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Protease accessibility laddering: a proteomic tool for probing protein structure. , 2006, Structure.

[30]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  G. Blobel,et al.  Nup358, a Cytoplasmically Exposed Nucleoporin with Peptide Repeats, Ran-GTP Binding Sites, Zinc Fingers, a Cyclophilin A Homologous Domain, and a Leucine-rich Region (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  A. Sali,et al.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment , 2009 .

[33]  J. Berger,et al.  The N-terminal domain of Nup159 forms a beta-propeller that functions in mRNA export by tethering the helicase Dbp5 to the nuclear pore. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[34]  D. Goldfarb,et al.  Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Stewart,et al.  Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-beta homologue, Kap95p. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  M. Rout,et al.  The Nuclear Pore Complex as a Transport Machine* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[40]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  T L Blundell,et al.  FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  P E Bourne,et al.  Membranes. Engineering and design. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[43]  A. Krogh,et al.  A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  P. Silver,et al.  Multiple Conformations in the Ligand-binding Site of the Yeast Nuclear Pore-targeting Domain of Nup116p* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  C. Akey,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[46]  U. Aebi,et al.  Toward a more complete 3-D structure of the nuclear pore complex. , 1991, Journal of structural biology.

[47]  Richard Bayliss,et al.  Structural Basis for the Interaction between FxFG Nucleoporin Repeats and Importin-β in Nuclear Trafficking , 2000, Cell.

[48]  E. Conti,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition of a nucleoporin FG repeat by the NTF2-like domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA nuclear export factor. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[49]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server , 2000, Bioinform..

[50]  O. Fromentin,et al.  In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments. , 1999, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[51]  A. Lupas Prediction and analysis of coiled-coil structures. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[52]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  Improvement of the GenTHREADER Method for Genomic Fold Recognition , 2003, Bioinform..