Biomechanical properties of feline ventral abdominal wall and celiotomy closure techniques

Abstract Objective To compare biomechanical properties and mechanism of failure of 3 regions of ventral abdominal wall in cats by using 2 suture materials, 2 suture bite‐to‐stitch intervals (SBSI), and full‐thickness versus fascia‐only closure. Study Design Randomized, cadaveric, ex vivo mechanical testing. Sample Population 16 adult cat cadavers, 3 samples per cat. Methods Three regions of ventral abdominal wall were mechanically tested (N = 48 samples). Preumbilical, umbilical (U), and postumbilical (POU) regions were harvested by using a template. The thickness of the linea alba was recorded. Six samples without celiotomy served as controls. Twenty‐eight samples were randomized to SBSI (2 × 2 or 5 × 5 mm) and suture material (3‐0 polyglactin 910 or 3‐0 polydioxanone) for simple continuous celiotomy closure. Fourteen samples were randomized to full‐thickness or fascia‐only closure. Samples were tested by linear distraction; tensile strength and mechanism of failure were recorded. Effects of body weight, thickness of linea alba, anatomic region, SBSI, type of closure, and suture material were evaluated by mixed model linear analysis. Load to failure was compared between males and females, full‐thickness and fascia‐only closure by independent t test, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. Results The POU region achieved lower loads to failure. Load to failure was greater in males compared with females. No difference was detected between full‐thickness and fascia‐only closure. Failure most commonly occurred by tearing of suture through tissues. Tissue failure with suture line loosening occurred mainly in the 5 × 5‐mm SBSI group. Conclusion The POU region is biomechanically weak and may therefore be predisposed to incisional herniation.

[1]  C. Simms,et al.  The in vitro passive elastic response of chicken pectoralis muscle to applied tensile and compressive deformation. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[2]  D. Griffon,et al.  Complications in small animal surgery , 2016 .

[3]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[4]  L. Israelsson,et al.  Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[5]  S. Elder,et al.  A cryogenic clamping technique that facilitates ultimate tensile strength determinations in tendons and ligaments , 2011, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[6]  Daniel Millbourn,et al.  Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[7]  D. C. Brown,et al.  Major abdominal evisceration injuries in dogs and cats: 12 cases (1998-2008). , 2009, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  L. Galuppo,et al.  An in vitro comparison of two suture intervals using braided absorbable loop suture in the equine linea alba. , 2006, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[9]  A. Rath,et al.  The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[10]  B. Rohrbach,et al.  Tissue strength and wound morphology of the equine linea alba after ventral median celiotomy. , 2000, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[11]  S. W. Allen,et al.  Tissue reactivity to poliglecaprone 25 in the feline linea alba. , 1999, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[12]  J. Anderson.  Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  J. Kirpensteijn,et al.  Comparison of stainless steel fascial staples and polypropylene suture material for closure of the linea alba in dogs. , 1993, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[14]  T. Fossum,et al.  Exploratory celiotomy in 200 nontraumatized dogs and cats. , 1992, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[15]  Campbell Ja,et al.  A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba. , 1989 .

[16]  G. Robinson,et al.  Knot security of suture materials. , 1989, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[17]  C. Frank,et al.  A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba. , 1989, Surgery.

[18]  D. F. Rochester,et al.  Characteristics and functional significance of canine abdominal muscles. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  L. Freeman,et al.  Tissue reaction to suture material in the feline linea alba. A retrospective, prospective, and histologic study. , 1987, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[20]  E. Rosin,et al.  Effect of fascial closure technique on strength of healing abdominal incision in the dog. A biomechanical study. , 1987, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[21]  G. V. Poole.  Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence. , 1985, Surgery.

[22]  D. Slatter.  Textbook of small animal surgery , 1985 .

[23]  Howard E. Evans,et al.  Miller's anatomy of the dog , 1979 .

[24]  D. Crowe.  Closure of Abdominal Incisions Using A Continuous Polypropylene Suture: Clinical Experience in 550 Dogs and Cats , 1978 .

[25]  T. P. Jenkins.  The burst abdominal wound: A mechanical approach , 1976, The British journal of surgery.

[26]  C. Aberg,et al.  Tissue strength of structures involved in musculo-aponeurotic layer sutures in laparotomy incisions. , 1976, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[27]  K. Yamase.  [Abdominal wall]. , 1969, Shujutsu. Operation.

[28]  J. Harris,et al.  Tensile Testing , 1967, Testing of the Plastic Deformation of Metals.