Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support

A considerable number of studies have recently used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the mechanisms underlying error processing. Nevertheless, how these mechanisms are associated with behavioral adjustments following errors remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated how posterror slowing is linked to outcome expectations and error feedback. We used an adaptive four-choice reaction time task to manipulate outcome expectancy. Behaviorally, the results show posterror slowing when errors are unexpected and postcorrect slowing when correct responses are unexpected, indicating that outcome expectancy is crucial for posterror slowing. ERP analyses revealed that the error-related negativity and the feedback-related negativity were not correlated with the behavioral reaction time pattern, whereas the P3 was. The results support the hypothesis that posterror slowing is caused by attentional orienting to unexpected events.

[1]  R. Compton,et al.  Alpha power is influenced by performance errors. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[2]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Independent Coding of Reward Magnitude and Valence in the Human Brain , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  R. West,et al.  Tracking the temporal dynamics of updating cognitive control: an examination of error processing. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: a neurocomputational theory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  To P(E) or not to P(E): a P3-like ERP component reflecting the processing of response errors. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[6]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study , 2006, Brain Research.

[8]  C. Patrick,et al.  Violent offending predicts P300 amplitude. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  M. Falkenstein,et al.  Error Processing in Normal Aging and in Basal Ganglia Disorders Experimental Procedures Participants Six Groups Were Enrolled into Study. a Group of 17 Medicated Patients with Pd Measured after Overnight Withdrawal off Their , 2022 .

[10]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300 , 2005, Neuroreport.

[13]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[14]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Wim Fias,et al.  Post-error slowing: An orienting account , 2009, Cognition.

[16]  J. Polich.  Theoretical Overview of P3a and P3b , 2003 .

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[18]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning , 2009, Brain Research.

[19]  J. Intriligator,et al.  On the relationship between EEG and ERP variability. , 1995, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  D Laming,et al.  Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. , 1979, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[23]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Errors in reward prediction are re£ected in the event-related brain potential , 2003 .

[24]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  A neurophysiological study of the detrimental effects of alprazolam on human action monitoring. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[26]  L. Fellows,et al.  Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Plays a Necessary Role in Rapid Error Prediction in Humans , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  The error negativity in nonmedicated and medicated patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[30]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  T. Endrass,et al.  ERP correlates of conscious error recognition: aware and unaware errors in an antisaccade task , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[33]  A. Kok,et al.  The effect of warning stimulus novelty on the P300 and components of the contingent negative variation , 1978, Biological Psychology.

[34]  D. Tucker,et al.  Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  R. Simons,et al.  To err is autonomic: error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[37]  B. Eppinger,et al.  Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Robert F. Simons,et al.  Oops!.. I did it again: An ERP and behavioral study of double-errors , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[40]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Error-Related Negativity Predicts Reinforcement Learning and Conflict Biases , 2005, Neuron.

[43]  P. Rabbitt.  Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[45]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[47]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Noradrenergic Stimulation Enhances Human Action Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Lauren M. Bylsma,et al.  The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[51]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[52]  J. Ford,et al.  Response-monitoring dysfunction in schizophrenia: an event-related brain potential study. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[53]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Adaptive Actions after Slips , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[55]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 and handedness: on the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[56]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Bryan Rodgers,et al.  What does a Man do after he Makes an Error? An Analysis of Response Programming , 1977 .

[58]  W. Gehring,et al.  Functions of the Medial Frontal Cortex in the Processing of Conflict and Errors , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[60]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[61]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.