Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice Through a Systems Approach: The Report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis

[1]  R. L. Singer.  Forensic firearms identification , 2014 .

[2]  Mark R. Rosekind,et al.  Crew Factors in Flight Operations X: Alertness Management in Flight Operations , 2013 .

[3]  J. McCall.  Employers and Employees , 2013 .

[4]  What are clinical interventions , 2013 .

[5]  D. Kaye.  Interpretation: Legal Perspective , 2012 .

[6]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[7]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Quantifying the weight of evidence from a forensic fingerprint comparison: a new paradigm , 2012 .

[8]  I. Dror,et al.  The Impact of Human–Technology Cooperation and Distributed Cognition in Forensic Science: Biasing Effects of AFIS Contextual Information on Human Experts * , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  K. Doki,et al.  [Ethics and regulation of clinical research]. , 2012, Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics.

[10]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems. , 2011, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[11]  Forensic Identification Science Evidence Since Daubert: Part II—Judicial Reasoning in Decisions to Exclude Forensic Identification Evidence on Grounds of Reliability , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  David H. Kaye,et al.  Reference Guide on Statistics , 2011 .

[13]  C. Champod,et al.  Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[14]  R. A. Hicklin,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Brandon L. Garrett.  Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong , 2011 .

[16]  M. Page,et al.  Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences--fact or fiction? , 2011, Forensic science international.

[17]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  Special Abilities and Vulnerabilities in Forensic Expertise , 2011 .

[18]  Jennifer L. Mnookin,et al.  The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences , 2011 .

[19]  E. Copeland,et al.  Temporal Trends in Rates of Patient Harm Resulting from Medical Care , 2011 .

[20]  Christophe Champod,et al.  The GYRO System: a Recommended Approach to More Transparent Documentation , 2011 .

[21]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Evaluation of Rarity of Fingerprints in Forensics , 2010, NIPS.

[22]  C. Landrigan,et al.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  C. Margo,et al.  Tilted optic disks. , 2010, Survey of ophthalmology.

[24]  Arun Ross,et al.  Detecting Altered Fingerprints , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[25]  E. Loftus,et al.  INSIGHTFUL OR WISHFUL: Lawyers' Ability to Predict Case Outcomes , 2010 .

[26]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  The Use of Technology in Human Expert Domains: Challenges and Risks Arising from the Use of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems in Forensic Science , 2010 .

[27]  I. Dror,et al.  The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Paul C. Giannelli.  INDEPENDENT CRIME LABORATORIES: THE PROBLEM OF MOTIVATIONAL AND COGNITIVE BIAS , 2010 .

[29]  David Zhang,et al.  High resolution partial fingerprint alignment using pore-valley descriptors , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[30]  The Courts, the NAS, and the Future of Forensic Science , 2010 .

[31]  D. Kaye.  The Double Helix and the Law of Evidence , 2010 .

[32]  Richa Singh,et al.  Combining pores and ridges with minutiae for improved fingerprint verification , 2009, Signal Process..

[33]  J. Cunningham.  History , 2007, The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

[34]  Melissa R. Gische,et al.  Latent Prints: A Perspective on the State of the Science , 2009 .

[35]  Christophe Champod.  Identification and Individualization , 2009 .

[36]  Christophe Champod.  Friction Ridge Examination (Fingerprints): Interpretation of , 2009 .

[37]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Evidence Interpretation: A Logical Approach , 2009 .

[38]  John M. Butler,et al.  Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing , 2009 .

[39]  A. Zellner,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT WITH THEORY , 2009, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[40]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Probability of Random Correspondence for Fingerprints , 2009, IWCF.

[41]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Match Likelihood Ratio for Uncertain Genotypes , 2009 .

[42]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[43]  David H. Kaye.  Probability, Individualization, and Uniqueness in Forensic Science Evidence: Listening to the Academies , 2009 .

[44]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Beyond Minutiae: A Fingerprint Individuality Model with Pattern, Ridge and Pore Features , 2009, ICB.

[45]  Pat A Wertheim,et al.  Testing for Potential Contextual Bias Effects During the Verification Stage of the ACE‐V Methodology when Conducting Fingerprint Comparisons * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[46]  Color Vision Panel Tests: A Metric for Interpreting Numeric Analytic Indices , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  David H. Kaye.  Trawling DNA Databases for Partial Matches: What is the FBI Afraid of? , 2009 .

[48]  Kaye,et al.  Identification, individualization and uniqueness: What’s the difference? † , 2009 .

[49]  Health hazards of noise: a review article. , 2009 .

[50]  M. Nicole,et al.  Interpretation of partial fingermarks using an automated fingerprint identification system , 2009 .

[51]  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[52]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Generative models for fingerprint individuality using ridge models , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[53]  Cedric Neumann,et al.  Level 3 details and their role in fingerprint identification: A survey among practitioners , 2008 .

[54]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Low luminance visual dysfunction as a predictor of subsequent visual acuity loss from geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[55]  Max Welling,et al.  Beyond the individuality of fingerprints: a measure of simulated computer latent print source attribution accuracy , 2008 .

[56]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[57]  Simon Ford,et al.  Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[58]  S. Dovey,et al.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[59]  F Taroni,et al.  Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[60]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[61]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Understanding Adverse Events: A Human Factors Framework , 2008 .

[62]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[63]  Harish Srinivasan,et al.  On the Discriminability of the Handwriting of Twins , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[64]  J. Darden,et al.  Guidelines on good clinical laboratory practice: bridging operations between research and clinical research laboratories. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[65]  K. Taherian,et al.  Mentoring for doctors. Do its benefits outweigh its disadvantages? , 2008, Medical teacher.

[66]  G. Langenburg.  Deposition of Bloody Friction Ridge Impressions , 2008 .

[67]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence , 2008 .

[68]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Discriminability of Fingerprints of Twins , 2008 .

[69]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Extraction of Level 2 and Level 3 Features for Fragmentary Fingerprint Comparison , 2008 .

[70]  Siomon A. Cole,et al.  More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification , 2007 .

[71]  V. Galera,et al.  Biological variability of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population. , 2007, Forensic Science International.

[72]  M. Ávila,et al.  Comparison of the original Amsler grid with the preferential hyperacuity perimeter for detecting choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. , 2007, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[73]  Yi Chen,et al.  Dots and Incipients: Extended Features for Partial Fingerprint Matching , 2007, 2007 Biometrics Symposium.

[74]  Christophe Champod.  Fingerprint examination: towards more transparency , 2007 .

[75]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert , 2007 .

[76]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Comment on 'Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert' , 2007 .

[77]  Jim Q. Smith,et al.  Rotationally invariant statistics for examining the evidence from the pores in fingerprints , 2007 .

[78]  Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities , 2007 .

[79]  Contrast sensitivity loss in the peripheral visual field following laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[80]  Jennifer L. Mnookin.  The Validity of Latent Fingerprint Identification: Confessions of a Fingerprinting Moderate , 2007 .

[81]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[82]  S. Gibson,et al.  Measurement of process as quality control in the management of acute surgical emergencies , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[83]  E. Pronin.  Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Any Number of Minutiæ , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[85]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Models for Assessing the Individuality of Fingerprints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[86]  T. Tape,et al.  Echocardiography, endocarditis, and clinical information bias , 1986, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[87]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Thinking About Expert Evidence as Expert Testimony , 2007 .

[88]  H. Kumbnani.  Dermatoglyphics : A Review , 2007 .

[89]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[90]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  Computation of Likelihood Ratios in Fingerprint Identification for Configurations of Three Minutiæ , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[91]  Donovan A. McFarlane,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels , 2006 .

[92]  D. P. Baker,et al.  Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. , 2006, Health services research.

[93]  David Charlton,et al.  Why Experts Make Errors , 2006 .

[94]  S. Block,et al.  Color vision screening for individuals with intellectual disabilities: a comparison between the Neitz Test of Color Vision and Color Vision Testing Made Easy. , 2006, Optometry.

[95]  Max M. Houck,et al.  Fundamentals of Forensic Science , 2006 .

[96]  C M Triggs,et al.  An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[97]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[98]  D. Kaye.  The NRC Bullet-Lead Report: Should Science Committees Make Legal Findings? , 2006 .

[99]  JoAnn Buscaglia,et al.  Review of the Scientific Basis for Friction Ridge Comparisons as a Means of Identification: Committee Findings and Recommendations , 2006 .

[100]  Susie Richmond.  Do fingerprint ridges and characteristics within ridges change with pressure ? , 2006 .

[101]  Michele Triplett,et al.  The Etiology of ACE-V and its Proper Use: An Exploration of the Relationship Between ACE-V and the Scientific Method of Hypothesis Testing , 2006 .

[102]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony , 2006 .

[103]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[104]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[105]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  A novel approach to fingerprint image quality , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[106]  Henri Juslén,et al.  Mechanisms involved in enhancing human performance by changing the lighting in the industrial workplace , 2005 .

[107]  Karthik Namasivayam,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF ERGONOMIC DESIGN AND PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS IN FOODSERVICE PRODUCTION TABLES , 2005 .

[108]  I. Dror,et al.  When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top‐down processing on matching fingerprints , 2005 .

[109]  F. Eperjesi,et al.  The macular mapping test: a reliability study , 2005, BMC ophthalmology.

[110]  Dale A. Nance,et al.  Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random‐Match Probability , 2005, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[111]  Benjamin A. Clegg,et al.  Interruption Management: The Use of Attention-Directing Tactile Cues , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[112]  Robert B. Stacey.  Report on the Erroneous Fingerprint Individualization in the Madrid Train Bombing Case , 2005 .

[113]  Theodore Speroff,et al.  The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of health-care professionals. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[114]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[115]  P O Fanger,et al.  Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance. , 2004, Indoor air.

[116]  M Kolich,et al.  Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort , 2004, Ergonomics.

[117]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Study of the Distinctiveness of Level 2 and Level 3 Features in Fragmentary Fingerprint Comparison , 2004, ECCV Workshop BioAW.

[118]  Robert Stone,et al.  Ergonomics in medicine and surgery , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[119]  Ann E. K. Page.  Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses , 2004 .

[120]  Craig Zimring,et al.  The Role of the Physical Environment in the Hospital of the 21 st Century: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Opportunity , 2004 .

[121]  Raymond N. J. Veldhuis,et al.  Likelihood-ratio-based biometric verification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[122]  M Muzammil,et al.  Effect of noise on human performance under variable load in a die casting industry--a case study. , 2004, Journal of environmental science & engineering.

[123]  Chitra Dorai,et al.  Dynamic behavior analysis in compressed fingerprint videos , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[124]  David H. Kaye,et al.  Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints , 2003 .

[125]  P. Carayon,et al.  Reducing Workload and Increasing Patient Safety Through Work and Workspace Design , 2003 .

[126]  Hal W Hendrick,et al.  Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[127]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[128]  M J Saks,et al.  Context effects in forensic science: a review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. , 2003, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[129]  R. Gaensslen.  How do I become a forensic scientist? Educational pathways to forensic science careers , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[130]  Russell P. Leslie,et al.  Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? , 2003 .

[131]  Ellen C Haas,et al.  Noise, stress, and annoyance in a pediatric intensive care unit , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[132]  Abbas Moallem.  Usability of Software On-line Documentation: A User Study , 2003 .

[133]  George Lin,et al.  The feasibility of external blind DNA proficiency testing. II. Experience with actual blind tests. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[134]  P. Boyce,et al.  The Benefits of Daylight through Windows , 2003 .

[135]  mith,et al.  Statistical Practice The Role of Informative Priors in Zero-Numerator Problems : Being Conservative Versus Being Candid , 2003 .

[136]  D. Spence.  Interpreting the evidence , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[137]  William J. Fisk,et al.  WORKER PERFORMANCE AND VENTILATION: ANALYSES OF INDIVIDUAL DATA FOR CALL-CENTER WORKERS , 2002 .

[138]  Marianne Schürenkamp,et al.  The GEDNAP (German DNA profiling group) blind trial concept , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[139]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what , 2002, The Lancet.

[140]  William C. Thompson,et al.  The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion , 2002 .

[141]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  On the individuality fingerprints , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[142]  Jennifer L. Mnookin.  Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling , 2001 .

[143]  T. Wickens.  Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[144]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Context of Use within usability activities , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[145]  K. Roberts,et al.  Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations , 2001 .

[146]  David Stoney,et al.  Measurement of Fingerprint Individuality , 2001 .

[147]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  Suspect Identities , 2001 .

[148]  W. Hendee.  To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System , 2001 .

[149]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[150]  R. Hayward,et al.  What is an error? , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[151]  J A Lambert,et al.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[152]  Katina Zammit,et al.  Computer Icons: A Picture Says a Thousand Words. Or Does It? , 2000 .

[153]  Keith L. Monson,et al.  Source Attribution of a Forensic DNA Profile , 2000 .

[154]  R. Gibberd,et al.  Epidemiology of medical error , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[155]  S. Luthar,et al.  Research on Resilience: Response to Commentaries. , 2000 .

[156]  M Topf,et al.  Hospital noise pollution: an environmental stress model to guide research and clinical interventions. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[157]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[158]  David R. Ashbaugh,et al.  Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology , 1999 .

[159]  Expert Witnesses: Ethics and Professionalism , 1999 .

[160]  Robert L Sumwalt,et al.  Cockpit Interruptions and Distractions: Effective Management Requires a Careful Balancing Act , 1999 .

[161]  J A Lambert,et al.  A model for case assessment and interpretation. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[162]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[163]  M. Saks.  Merlin and Solomon: Lessons from the Law's Formative Encounters with Forensic Identification Science , 1998 .

[164]  R. Macklis,et al.  Error rates in clinical radiotherapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[165]  B S Hawkins,et al.  Visual function abnormalities and prognosis in eyes with age-related geographic atrophy of the macula and good visual acuity. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[166]  A. R. Roddy,et al.  Fingerprint features-statistical analysis and system performance estimates , 1997 .

[167]  E. Midena,et al.  Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[168]  Margaret Berger.  Laboratory Error Seen Through the Lens of Science and Policy , 1997 .

[169]  R A Henning,et al.  Frequent short rest breaks from computer work: effects on productivity and well-being at two field sites. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[170]  Susan J Leat,et al.  The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision , 1997, Eye.

[171]  C. Kon,et al.  A new colour vision test for clinical use , 1996, Eye.

[172]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Statistical analysis of STR data , 1996 .

[173]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Reconnaissance automatique et analyse statistique des minuties sur les empreintes digitales , 1996 .

[174]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Adaptive flow orientation-based feature extraction in fingerprint images , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[175]  Bernard Robertson,et al.  Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom , 1995 .

[176]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Pathways linking affective disturbances and physical disorders. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[177]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[178]  J. Reason.  Understanding adverse events: human factors. , 1995, Quality in health care : QHC.

[179]  R. Camp.  Business process benchmarking : finding and implementing best practices , 1995 .

[180]  J. W. Moore.  Reference manual on scientific evidence , 1995 .

[181]  M Ala,et al.  Ergonomics in the laboratory environment. , 1994, Nursing management.

[182]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[183]  R. Felder.  Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. , 1993 .

[184]  James F. Cowger,et al.  Friction Ridge Skin: Comparison and Identification of Fingerprints , 1992 .

[185]  Marc Rettig,et al.  Nobody reads documentation , 1991, CACM.

[186]  N. Meshkati.  Human factors in large-scale technological systems' accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl , 1991 .

[187]  D A Stoney,et al.  What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[188]  John W. Senders,et al.  Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction , 1991 .

[189]  K. Roberts.  Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[190]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts , 1990 .

[191]  N. Elman,et al.  Organizational benefits of mentoring , 1990 .

[192]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[193]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[194]  The Ethical Responsibilities of the Forensic Scientist: Exploring the Limits , 1989 .

[195]  D A Stoney,et al.  A medical model for criminalistics education. , 1988, Journal of forensic sciences.

[196]  J. Berger.  Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[197]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[198]  Larry S. Miller,et al.  Procedural bias in forensic science examinations of human hair , 1987 .

[199]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[200]  Madbuli H. Noweir,et al.  Noise exposure as related to productivity, disciplinary actions, absenteeism, and accidents among textile workers , 1984 .

[201]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[202]  J A Hanley,et al.  If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. , 1983, JAMA.

[203]  J D Nicol,et al.  Fingerprint comparison. I: Similarity of fingerprints. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[204]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[205]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[206]  P Doubilet,et al.  Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[207]  J. Nevid.  Effects of Brand Labeling on Ratings of Product Quality , 1981 .

[208]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Parameter after Observing No Successes , 1981 .

[209]  P. Sander.  Decision and estimation theory , 1980 .

[210]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial accident prevention : a safety management approach , 1980 .

[211]  Stanley L. Sclove,et al.  The occurrence of fingerprint characteristics as a two-dimensional poisson process , 1980 .

[212]  S. Sclove.  The Occurrence of Fingerprint Characteristics as a Two-Dimensional Process , 1979 .

[213]  Moving Towards Professionalization of Latent Print Examiners , 1979 .

[214]  T. Parthasarathy,et al.  Development of a Mathematical Formula for the Calculation of Fingerprint Probabilities Based on Individual Characteristics , 1977 .

[215]  Richard Saferstein,et al.  Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science , 1977 .

[216]  tephen E. Palmer.  The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[217]  Belinda Lowenhaupt Collins,et al.  Windows and people : a literature survey : psychological reaction to environments with and without windows , 1975 .

[218]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[219]  Ralph W. Tyler,et al.  Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction , 1969 .

[220]  A Richardson,et al.  The evidential value of the comparison of paint flakes from sources other than vehicles. , 1968, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[221]  F Thomas,et al.  Comments on the discovery of striation matching and on early contributions to forensic firearms identification. , 1967, Journal of forensic sciences.

[222]  Kenneth P. Uhl,et al.  Influence of Beer Brand Identification on Taste Perception , 1964 .

[223]  J W OSTERBURG,et al.  AN INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE OF PROOF. THE IDENTITY OF FINGERPRINTS. , 1964, Journal of forensic sciences.

[224]  M. Schreiber,et al.  The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. , 1963, JAMA.

[225]  Jack W. Dunlap,et al.  Applied experimental psychology. Human factors in engineering design. , 1950 .

[226]  Edward Richard Henry,et al.  Classification and uses of finger prints , 1928 .

[227]  W. E. Hempson.  Expert Evidence , 1897, British medical journal.