Assessment of seismic risks in code conforming reinforced concrete frames

Abstract The main objective of this study is to employ performance-based earthquake engineering procedure to evaluate earthquake-induced risks in modern code-conforming reinforced (RC) concrete moment frames in terms of collapse risk and possible human and financial losses. A set of 30 archetype RC moment frames, designed based on the ASCE 7-05 and ACI 318-05 requirements, is selected for the evaluation purpose. The buildings are classified into 4-, 8- and 12-story and are designed with different levels of structural system ductility. The archetypes are assumed to be located in three zones with low, moderate and high levels of seismic hazard. The findings of the collapse assessment procedure indicate that the seismicity of the location significantly affects the collapse performance and the ductility, as long as the structure conforms to the requirements of modern design codes, has the least influence on the collapse risk. Also, it has been found that the expected annual repair costs lie in an interval with the minimum and maximum of 0.02% and 1.5% of the replacement cost and expected annual number of deaths ranges from 2 × 10−4% to 29 × 10−3% of the total occupants with the buildings located in the low seismicity zone having the minimum amounts of losses. Sensitivity analysis is employed to study the variations of earthquake consequences due to the variations in the design decisions.

[1]  Adrian M. Chandler,et al.  Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: a multi-disciplinary review , 2001 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  Assessing the collapse risk of California's existing reinforced concrete frame structures: Metrics for seismic safety decisions , 2008 .

[4]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[5]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[6]  M. J. Richard,et al.  Case Study on the Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Intermediate Moment Frames Using ACI Design Provisions , 2010 .

[7]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2012 .

[8]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code‐conforming reinforced‐concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses , 2007 .

[9]  F. Charney Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures , 2008 .

[10]  R. Medina,et al.  A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems , 2010 .

[11]  Marc Hoit,et al.  Structures Congress 2010 , 2010 .

[12]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[13]  F. Vecchio,et al.  THE MODIFIED COMPRESSION FIELD THEORY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTS SUBJECTED TO SHEAR , 1986 .

[14]  Laura N. Lowes,et al.  Evaluation, calibration, and verification of a reinforced concrete beam-column joint model , 2007 .

[15]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. I: Assessment of Ductile Moment Frames , 2011 .

[16]  Judith Mitrani-Reiser,et al.  AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: PROBABILISTIC LOSS ESTIMATION FOR PERFORMANCE - BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[17]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 2005 .

[18]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. II: Comparative Assessment of Nonductile and Ductile Moment Frames , 2011 .

[19]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development , 2001 .