Pulsed detonation rocket engines (PDREs) have generated considerable research interest in recent years as a chemical propulsion system potentially offering improved performance and reduced complexity compared to conventional rocket engines. The detonative mode of combustion employed by these devices offers a thermodynamic advantage over the constant-pressure deflagrative combustion mode used in conventional rocket engines and gas turbines. However, while this theoretical advantage has spurred a great deal of interest in building PDRE devices, the unsteady blowdown process intrinsic to the PDRE has made realistic estimates of the actual propulsive performance problematic. The recent review article by Kailasanath highlights some of the difficulties in comparing the available experimental measurements with numerical models. In a previous paper by the author, parametric studies of the performance of a single, straight-tube PDRE were reported. A 1-D, unsteady method of characteristics code, employing a constant-gamma assumption behind the detonation front, was developed for that study. Models of this type are computationally inexpensive, and are particularly useful for parametric performance comparisons. For example, a plot showing the specific impulse of various PDRE and steady-state rocket engine (SSRE) configurations as a function of blowdown pressure ratio. The performance curves clearly indicate that a straight-tube PDRE is superior in specific impulse to a SSRE with a sonic nozzle over the entire range of pressure ratios. Note, however, that a straight-tube PDRE in general does not compare favorably to a SSRE fitted with an optimized de Laval supersonic nozzle, particularly at the high pressure ratios typical for boost or in-space rocket applications. However, the calculations also show that if a dynamically optimized, supersonic de Laval nozzle could be could be fitted to a PDRE, then the specific impulse of the device would exceed that of a comparable SSRE. While such a nozzle is a considerable idealization, it is clear that nozzle design and optimization will play a critical role in whether the performance potential of PDREs can be effectively realized in practice. In order to study PDRE nozzle issues with greater accuracy, a quasi-one-dimensional, finite-rate chemistry CFD code has been developed by the author. Comparisons of the code with both the previous MOC model and experimental data from Stanford University are reported. The effect of constant-gamma and finite-rate chemistry assumptions on the flowfield and performance is examined. Parametric studies of the effect of nozzle throat size and expansion ratio, at various blowdown pressure ratios, are reported.
[1]
Christopher I. Morris.
Simplified Analysis of Pulse Detonation Rocket Engine Blowdown Gasdynamics and Performance
,
2002
.
[2]
H. C. Yee,et al.
A class of high resolution explicit and implicit shock-capturing methods
,
1989
.
[3]
G. Strang.
On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes
,
1968
.
[4]
B. Larrouturou.
How to preserve the mass fractions positivity when computing compressible multi-component flows
,
1991
.
[5]
J. Robert,et al.
CHEMKIN-II: A FORTRAN Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas-Phase Chemical Kinetics
,
1989
.
[6]
Sanford Gordon,et al.
Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions
,
1972
.
[7]
R. J. Kee,et al.
Chemkin-II : A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics
,
1991
.
[8]
T. E. Bratkovich,et al.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PULSE DETONATION ROCKET ENGINES (PDREs)
,
1997
.
[9]
Bernard Grossman,et al.
Flux-split algorithms for flows with non-equilibrium chemistry and vibrational relaxation
,
1990
.
[10]
Martin A. Reno,et al.
Coefficients for calculating thermodynamic and transport properties of individual species
,
1993
.
[11]
J. Troe.
Predictive possibilities of unimolecular rate theory
,
1979
.
[12]
Charles L. Merkle,et al.
A numerical study of pulse detonation engine performance
,
2000
.
[13]
Elaine S. Oran,et al.
Numerical Simulation of Reactive Flow
,
1987
.
[14]
Ronald K. Hanson,et al.
Reduced kinetics mechanisms for ram accelerator combustion
,
1997
.
[15]
Kailas Kailasanath,et al.
A review of PDE research-performance estimates
,
2001
.
[16]
T. Poinsot.
Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows
,
1992
.