Clinical presentation of inhalational anthrax following bioterrorism exposure: report of 2 surviving patients.

The use of anthrax as a weapon of biological terrorism has moved from theory to reality in recent weeks. Following processing of a letter containing anthrax spores that had been mailed to a US senator, 5 cases of inhalational anthrax have occurred among postal workers employed at a major postal facility in Washington, DC. This report details the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and initial therapy of 2 of these patients. The clinical course is in some ways different from what has been described as the classic pattern for inhalational anthrax. One patient developed low-grade fever, chills, cough, and malaise 3 days prior to admission, and then progressive dyspnea and cough productive of blood-tinged sputum on the day of admission. The other patient developed progressively worsening headache of 3 days' duration, along with nausea, chills, and night sweats, but no respiratory symptoms, on the day of admission. Both patients had abnormal findings on chest radiographs. Non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest showing mediastinal adenopathy led to a presumptive diagnosis of inhalational anthrax in both cases. The diagnoses were confirmed by blood cultures and polymerase chain reaction testing. Treatment with antibiotics, including intravenous ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and clindamycin, and supportive therapy appears to have slowed the progression of inhalational anthrax and has resulted to date in survival.

[1]  J. Ezzell,et al.  Pathology of experimental inhalation anthrax in the rhesus monkey. , 1995, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[2]  K. Vessal,et al.  Radiological changes in inhalation anthrax. A report of radiological and pathological correlation in two cases. , 1975, Clinical radiology.

[3]  T J Cieslak,et al.  Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. , 1997, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[4]  T J Cieslak,et al.  Biological warfare : A historical perspective , 1997 .

[5]  M. Hugh-jones,et al.  The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. , 1994, Science.

[6]  J. Cohen,et al.  Comparative effects of clindamycin and ampicillin on superantigenic activity of Streptococcus pyogenes. , 1997, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  Philip K. Russell,et al.  Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. , 1999, JAMA.

[8]  P. Brachman,et al.  Industrial inhalation Anthrax. , 1966, Bacteriological reviews.

[9]  T. Raffin,et al.  Inhalational anthrax: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. , 1999, Chest.

[10]  D H Walker,et al.  Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak of 1979. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  John E. Bennett,et al.  Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Vols 1 and 2. , 1979 .

[12]  O. Yampolskaya,et al.  Quantitative Pathology of Inhalational Anthrax I: Quantitative Microscopic Findings , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[13]  W S GOCHENOUR,et al.  PATHOLOGY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESPIRATORY ANTHRAX IN MACACA MULATTA. , 1963, British journal of experimental pathology.

[14]  L. Lutwick,et al.  Inhalational anthrax , 2020, Current infectious disease reports.

[15]  D. Yousem,et al.  A clear and present danger? , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  J. D. Malone,et al.  Anthrax as a potential biological warfare agent. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.