Fundamental scaling laws for energy-efficient storage and querying in wireless sensor networks

We use a constrained optimization framework to derive fundamental scaling laws for both unstructured sensor networks (which use blind sequential search for querying) and structured sensor networks (which use efficient hash-based querying). We find that the scalability of a sensor network's performance depends upon whether or not the increase in energy and storage resources with more nodes is outweighed by the concomitant application-specific increase in event and query loads. Let m be the number of events sensed by a network over a finite period of deployment, q the number of queries for each event, and N the size of the network. Our key finding is that q1/2•m must be O(N1/4)for unstructured net-works, and q2/3•m must be O(N1/2)for structured networks, to ensure scalable network performance. These conditions determine (i) whether or not the energy requirement per node grows without bound with the network size for a fixed-duration deployment, (ii) whether or not there exists a maximum network size that can be operated for a specified duration on a fixed energy budget, and (iii) whether the network lifetime increases or decreases with the size of the network for a fixed energy budget. We discuss the practical implications of these results for the design of hierarchical two-tier wireless sensor networks.

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Data-Centric Storage in Sensornets with GHT, a Geographic Hash Table , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[2]  Konstantinos Kalpakis,et al.  Efficient algorithms for maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Optimizing Data Replication for Expanding Ring-based Queries in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks.

[4]  Sanjay Shakkottai,et al.  Asymptotics of query strategies over a sensor network , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[5]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[6]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Data-centric storage in sensornets , 2003, CCRV.

[7]  ChangJae-Hwan,et al.  Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks , 2004 .

[8]  Huang Zhihua,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL PERFORMANCE LIMITS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS , 2004 .

[9]  Ramesh Govindan Data-centric routing and storage in sensor networks , 2004 .

[10]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Derivations of the Expected Energy Costs of Search and Replication in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006 .

[11]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Push-Pull Query Strategies for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, DCOSS.

[12]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Hybrid Push-Pull Query Processing for Sensor Networks , 2004, GI Jahrestagung.

[13]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Combs, needles, haystacks: balancing push and pull for discovery in large-scale sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[14]  Anantha Chandrakasan,et al.  Bounding the lifetime of sensor networks via optimal role assignments , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[15]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Scalable Information-Driven Sensor Querying and Routing for Ad Hoc Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2002, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[16]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  Stephen B. Wicker,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL PERFORMANCE LIMITS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS , 2004 .

[18]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Revisiting the TTL-based controlled flooding search: optimality and randomization , 2004, MobiCom '04.