Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand knowledge broker decisions in selecting evidence for knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries

BackgroundHealth-related organisations disseminate an abundance of clinical and implementation evidence that has potential to improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but little is known about what influences a user decision to select particular evidence for action. Knowledge brokers (KBs) play a part as intermediaries supporting evidence-informed health policy and practice by selecting and synthesising evidence for research users, and therefore understanding the basis for KB decisions, can help inform knowledge translation strategies. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a synthesis of psychological theories, was selected as a promising analysis approach because of its widespread use in identifying influences on decisions to act on evidence-based healthcare guidelines. This study explored its application in the context of KB decisions regarding evidence for use in LMICs.MethodsThe study analysed data collected from participants of a 2015 global maternal and newborn health conference in Mexico. A total of 324 conference participants from 56 countries completed an online survey and 20 from 15 countries were interviewed about evidence use and sharing after the conference. TDF domains and constructs were retrospectively applied and adapted during coding of qualitative data to enhance understanding of the KB decision process in selecting evidence for action.ResultsApplication of the TDF involved challenges related to overlapping constructs, retrospective use, and complexities of global health settings and relevant knowledge. Codes needed to be added or adapted to account for how KBs’ internal reflections on external factors influenced their actions in selecting evidence to share and use, and the decisions they made during the process. Four themes of the rationale for changing the TDF were identified during analysis, namely Influences from Beyond the Organisation, Knowledge Selection as a Process, Access and Packaging of Knowledge, and Fit for Use.ConclusionsTheories of individual behaviour, such as those in the TDF, can enhance understanding of the decisions made by actors such as KBs along dissemination and knowledge translation pathways. Understanding how KBs reflect on evidence and interact with their environment has the potential for improving global dissemination efforts and LMIC-to-LMIC exchange of implementation evidence.

[1]  Benoit Aubert,et al.  Towards a better understanding of the intention to use eHealth services by medical professionals: The case of developing countries , 2013 .

[2]  K. Dainty,et al.  Knowledge brokering for healthy aging: a scoping review of potential approaches , 2016, Implementation Science.

[3]  Claire Glenton,et al.  The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[4]  Richard Baker,et al.  A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice , 2013, Implementation Science.

[5]  M. Strauss,et al.  Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[6]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems , 2017, Implementation Science.

[7]  Peter Mendel,et al.  Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research , 2007, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[8]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[9]  J. Puyana,et al.  Implementation of a Hospital Electronic Surgical Registry in a Lower-Middle-Income Country , 2016, World Journal of Surgery.

[10]  Mike English,et al.  Documenting the experiences of health workers expected to implement guidelines during an intervention study in Kenyan hospitals , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[11]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[12]  J. Lomas.  The in-between world of knowledge brokering , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  W. Levinson,et al.  Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: protocol for a qualitative study , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[14]  Sameer M. Siddiqi,et al.  Improving the use of evidence in public health policy development, enactment and implementation: a multiple-case study , 2019, Health education research.

[15]  S. Simpson.  Applying new evidence into practice: a need for knowledge translation. , 2015, The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy.

[16]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Niranjan Kissoon,et al.  Theoretical domains framework to assess barriers to change for planning health care quality interventions: a systematic literature review , 2016, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[18]  P. Adongo,et al.  School of Public Health , 2011 .

[19]  C. Weiss,et al.  TRUTH TESTS AND UTILITY TESTS: DECISION-MAKERS' FRAMES OF REFERENCE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH* , 1980 .

[20]  Gill Harvey,et al.  PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice , 2015, Implementation Science.

[21]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[22]  Morgan Meyer.  The Rise of the Knowledge Broker , 2010 .

[23]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework , 2012, Implementation Science.

[24]  A. Mekonnen,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to hospital pharmacists’ engagement in medication safety activities: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework , 2018, Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice.

[25]  J. Francis,et al.  Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework , 2012, Implementation Science.

[26]  J. Creswell,et al.  Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[27]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[28]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ use of electronic medication management systems in two Australian hospitals , 2017, Implementation Science.

[29]  C. Howell,et al.  Exploratory study of the role of knowledge brokers in translating knowledge to action following global maternal and newborn health technical meetings. , 2016, Public health.

[30]  Closing the gap: applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to improve knowledge translation , 2017, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[31]  T. Zan,et al.  A research utilisation framework for informing global health and development policies and programmes , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[32]  L. Wallin,et al.  Newborn care and knowledge translation - perceptions among primary healthcare staff in northern Vietnam , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[33]  C. Dagenais,et al.  Knowledge brokering in public health: A critical analysis of the results of a qualitative evaluation. , 2015, Evaluation and program planning.

[34]  I. Graham,et al.  Translating research into action: an international study of the role of research funders , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[35]  Gwyneth Rees,et al.  Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study , 2015, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[36]  Phil Brown,et al.  Bridging research and environmental regulatory processes: the role of knowledge brokers. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Maureen Dobbins,et al.  The evolution of social networks through the implementation of evidence-informed decision-making interventions: a longitudinal analysis of three public health units in Canada , 2015, Implementation Science.

[38]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Knowledge translation: An opportunity to reduce global health inequalities , 2009 .

[39]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[40]  John W. Creswell,et al.  A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research , 2014 .

[41]  N. Sewankambo,et al.  Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: The need for support structures. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[42]  Roy Cameron,et al.  A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies , 2009 .

[43]  S. Bennett,et al.  The Human Capital of Knowledge Brokers: An analysis of attributes, capacities and skills of academic teaching and research faculty at Kenyan schools of public health , 2016, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[44]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians’ beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework , 2012, Implementation Science.

[45]  M. Eccles,et al.  Understanding effects in reviews of implementation interventions using the Theoretical Domains Framework , 2015, Implementation Science.