Compensating for Failed Attention While Driving

Abstract While operating a motor vehicle, drivers must pay attention to other moving vehicles and the roadside environment in order to detect and process critical information related to the driving task. Using a driving simulator, this study investigated the effects of an unexpected event on driver performance in environments of more or less clutter and under situations of high attentional load. Attentional load was manipulated by varying the number of neighboring vehicles participants tracked for lane changes. After baseline-driving behavior was established, the unexpected event occurred: a pedestrian ran into the driver’s path. Tracking-accuracy, brake initiation, swerving, and verbal report of the unexpected pedestrian were used to assess driver performance. All participants verbally reported noticing the pedestrian. However, analyses of driving behavior revealed differences in the reactions to the pedestrian: drivers braked faster and had significantly less deviation in their steering heading with a lower attentional load, and participants in low clutter environments had a larger overall change in velocity. This research advances the understanding of how drivers allocate attention between various stimuli and the trade-offs between a driver’s focus on an assigned task and external objects within the roadway environment. Moreover, the results of this research lend insight into how to construct roadway environments that encourage driver attention toward the most immediate and relevant information to reduce both vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrian interactions.

[1]  D. Memmert The gap between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Knowledge about the probability of change affects change detection performance. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Driver distraction: A review of the literature , 2003 .

[5]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  I. D. Brown,et al.  Components of driving skill: experience does not mean expertise , 1991 .

[8]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[9]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Arne Stinchcombe,et al.  Driving in dangerous territory: Complexity and road-characteristics influence attentional demand , 2010 .

[12]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[13]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Mary Anne Bertola,et al.  The Effect of Visual Clutter on Driver Eye Glance Behavior , 2017 .

[17]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Multiple-object tracking while driving: the multiple-vehicle tracking task , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[19]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter , 2005, CHI.

[21]  David N. Lee,et al.  Where we look when we steer , 1994, Nature.

[22]  Steven B. Most Setting sights higher: category-level attentional set modulates sustained inattentional blindness , 2013, Psychological research.

[23]  Erik Nelson,et al.  The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Nicola J. Starkey,et al.  Driving on familiar roads: Automaticity and inattention blindness , 2013 .

[25]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  Randall M. Jones,et al.  Texting and Accessing the Web While Driving: Traffic Citations and Crashes Among Young Adult Drivers , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[29]  Robert S. Astur,et al.  Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents , 2007 .

[30]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[31]  David Shinar,et al.  Sign location, sign recognition, and driver expectancies , 2008 .

[32]  I. Hyman,et al.  Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone , 2009 .

[33]  Justin M. Ericson,et al.  The Effects of Incidentally Learned Temporal and Spatial Predictability on Response Times and Visual Fixations during Target Detection and Discrimination , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Kristen Pammer,et al.  Attentional differences in driving judgments for country and city scenes: Semantic congruency in inattentional blindness. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Visual search: a retrospective. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[37]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[38]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets , 2006 .

[39]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  David Shinar,et al.  How Automatic Is Manual Gear Shifting? , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[41]  Joel Hughes,et al.  Both Texting and Eating Are Associated With Impaired Simulated Driving Performance , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[42]  David Crundall,et al.  Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What’s “inattentional” about inattentional blindness? , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[45]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.