The regulation of fine movements in patients with Charcot Marie Tooth, type Ia: some ideas about continuous adaptation.

The flexibility of the human motor system is remarkable. Even when parts of the system are damaged, the output often remains optimal or near optimal. The neuromotor system is designed to keep the output optimal by shifting between input sources. This capability is termed the principle of continuous adaptation. This article describes an experiment in which patients suffering from a hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy, type 1a (Charcot Marie Tooth disease, type 1a), had to perform fine motor movements. We examined whether they were able to regulate these movements in spite of the fact that the somatosensory input and motor output was substantially impaired as a result of the chronic, slowly progressing neuropathy. It was predicted that these patients were able to perform fine movements as long as the movements were well known and over-learned. Furthermore, it was predicted that these patients would compensate for the loss of somatosensory information by becoming more dependent on vision. A second prediction was that the quality of the motor performance would break down when these patients had to perform a novel motor pattern. The performance of the patients (n=10) was contrasted with the performance of 20 healthy subjects. The results indicated that the patients, indeed, were able to perform the over-learned movements and that their performance deteriorated significantly when they had to perform a novel motor pattern. No indication, however, could be found for visual compensation.

[1]  R P Veth,et al.  Gait adaptations during walking under visual and cognitive constraints: a study of patients recovering from limb-saving surgery of the lower limb. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  A Curt,et al.  Influence of spinal cord injury on cerebral sensorimotor systems: a PET study. , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  A. Geurts,et al.  Attention demands in balance recovery following lower limb amputation. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  J Valls-Solé,et al.  Rapid modulation of human cortical motor outputs following ischaemic nerve block. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  P. Keuss,et al.  Does the production of letter strokes in handwriting benefit from vision? , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[6]  R. Dubner,et al.  Activity-dependent neuronal plasticity following tissue injury and inflammation , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  M Hallett,et al.  Rapid reversible modulation of human motor outputs after transient deafferentation of the forearm , 1992, Neurology.

[8]  A. Geurts,et al.  Postural organization in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N Teasdale,et al.  Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects , 1992, Neurology.

[10]  M Hallett,et al.  Reorganization of corticospinal pathways following spinal cord injury , 1991, Neurology.

[11]  R. N. Lemon,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation reveals reorganised cortical outputs in amputees , 1990, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  John P. Wann Trends in the refinement and optimization of fine-motor trajectories. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys , 1983, Neuroscience.

[14]  L. Hay Spatial-temporal analysis of movements in children. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  A. Luria The Working Brain: An Introduction To Neuropsychology , 1976 .

[16]  P M Rossini,et al.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  A. Wing,et al.  An Analysis Of Children's Penholds , 1986 .

[18]  J. Kaas,et al.  The reorganization of somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing mammals. , 1983, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[20]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  INTEGRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF THE CEREBRAL CORTEX , 1933 .