A cost-benefit analysis of public and private communication.

Understanding the diversity of animal signals requires knowledge of factors which may influence the different stages of communication, from the production of a signal by the sender up to the detection, identification and final decision-making in the receiver. We studied a Neotropical katydid (Docidocercus gigliotosi) which uses airborne sound for long distance communication, but also an alternative form of private signalling through substrate vibration. Males spend more time with private signalling under full moon conditions, when the nocturnal rainforest favours predation by visually hunting predators. For either type of signal we measured the energetic costs of producing it, its active space, and the background noise levels in both transmission channels. Signal perception was studied using neurophysiological methods under outdoor conditions, which is more reliable for the private mode of communication. Our results demonstrate the complex effects of ecological conditions, such as predation, nocturnal ambient light levels and masking noise on the performance of receivers in detecting mating signals, affecting the net advantage or disadvantage of either mode of communication.

[1]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  C. Magnhagen Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Michael D Greenfield Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication , 2002 .

[5]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Bat Predation and Its Influence on Calling Behavior in Neotropical Katydids , 1987, Science.

[6]  K. Prestwich,et al.  The Energetics of Acoustic Signaling in Anurans and Insects , 1994 .

[7]  J. Endler Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions , 1991, Vision Research.

[8]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  Trade‐offs to flight capability in Gryllus firmus: the influence of whole‐organism respiration rate on fitness , 2002 .

[9]  Dina K. N. Dechmann,et al.  Ecology of an exceptional roost: Energetic benefits could explain why the bat Lophostoma silvicolum roosts in active termite nests , 2004 .

[10]  Glenn K. Morris,et al.  Calling display and mating behaviour of Copiphora rhinoceros Pictet (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  R. C. Paul,et al.  Arboreal singing in a burrowing cricket,Anurogryllus arboreus , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  K. Haynes,et al.  Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: illicit signalers and receivers. , 1999 .

[13]  J A Swets,et al.  Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[15]  Friedrich G Barth,et al.  Spider senses - technical perfection and biology. , 2002, Zoology.

[16]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Roosting and Foraging Behavior of Two Neotropical Gleaning Bats, Tonatia silvicola and Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae) 1 , 1999 .

[18]  Dina K. N. Dechmann,et al.  Activity levels of bats and katydids in relation to the lunar cycle , 2005, Oecologia.

[19]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[20]  J. Bosch,et al.  Female preference in complex acoustical environments in the midwife toads Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cisternasii , 1997 .

[21]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .

[22]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  W. Maass,et al.  Probing Real Sensory Worlds of Receivers with Unsupervised Clustering , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Meta Virant-Doberlet,et al.  Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[25]  R. B. Lockard,et al.  Seasonal Change in the Activity Pattern of Dipodomys spectabilis , 1978 .

[26]  Jacqueline J. Belwood,et al.  Anti-Predator Defences and Ecology of Neotropical Forest Katydids, Especially the Pseudophyllinae , 1990 .

[27]  M. Ryan,et al.  Bat Predation and the Evolution of Frog Vocalizations in the Neotropics , 1981, Science.

[28]  F. G. Barth,et al.  Vibratory communication in spiders: Adaptation and compromise at many levels , 1997 .

[29]  Manfred Hartbauer,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Predation and noise in communication networks of neotropical katydids , 2005 .

[30]  H. C. Bennet-Clark,et al.  Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication , 1998 .

[31]  W. S. Bristowe,et al.  The world of spiders , 1971 .

[32]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The role of synchronized calling, ambient light, and ambient noise, in anti-bat-predator behavior of a treefrog , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  H. Gerhardt Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .

[34]  P. Bell,et al.  Transmission of vibrations along plant stems: implications for insect communication. , 1980 .

[35]  M. Zuk,et al.  Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[36]  R. Johnstone,et al.  CONSPIRATORIAL WHISPERS AND CONSPICUOUS DISPLAYS: GAMES OF SIGNAL DETECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Lucia F. Jacobs,et al.  Behavioural modulation of predation risk: moonlight avoidance and crepuscular compensation in a nocturnal desert rodent, Dipodomys merriami , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[41]  Holger R. Goerlitz,et al.  Sensory ecology of prey rustling sounds: acoustical features and their classification by wild Grey Mouse Lemurs , 2007 .

[42]  William H. Cade,et al.  Acoustically Orienting Parasitoids: Fly Phonotaxis to Cricket Song , 1975, Science.

[43]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[44]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  High ultrasonic and tremulation signals in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1994 .

[45]  S. Telford,et al.  MATE CHOICE OCCURS ONLY IN SMALL CHORUSES OF PAINTED REED FROGS HYPEROLIUS MARMORATUS , 1989 .

[46]  Molly E Cummings,et al.  A private ultraviolet channel in visual communication , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  J. Endler Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[49]  R. Cocroft,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Insect Vibrational Communication , 2005 .

[50]  J. Endler NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Insect hearing in the field , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[52]  H. Römer,et al.  The Signaller's Dilemma: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Public and Private Communication , 2010, PloS one.

[53]  Holger R. Goerlitz,et al.  Cues for acoustic detection of prey: insect rustling sounds and the influence of walking substrate , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[54]  J. Endler Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  S. Juliano,et al.  Predation and the evolution of prey behavior: an experiment with tree hole mosquitoes , 2002 .

[56]  Klaus-Gerhard Heller,et al.  Male bushcrickets favoured by parasitoid flies when acoustically more attractive for conspecific females (Orthoptera : Phanopteridae / Diptera : Tachinidae) , 2001 .

[57]  S. Haythornthwaite,et al.  Risks of calling by the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus : potential predation by Australian long-eared bats. , 1998 .