Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of breath-hold two-dimensional (2D) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo fast MR imaging compared with helical CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Thirty patients with gastric carcinoma underwent preoperative MR imaging and helical CT. MR imaging at 1.5 T was performed immediately after the intramuscular injection of scopolamine and the oral administration of water or effervescent granules. Breath-hold 2D FLASH T1-weighted images in all three planes, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted axial images, and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed 2D FLASH axial images were included. Helical CT was performed 60 sec after initiation of i.v. contrast medium injection (2.5-3 ml/sec). Two groups of two radiologists each independently analyzed the MR and helical CT findings, and these results were compared with the pathologic findings. RESULTS For T staging, MR imaging accuracy was higher than that of helical CT (73.3% and 66.7%, respectively); however, the accuracies of the two methods were not significantly different from each other (McNemar test, p > 0.05). Overstaging was noted in 6.7% of cases with MR imaging and 10% with helical CT. Understaging was noted in 20% of cases with MR imaging and 23.3% with helical CT. For N staging, the accuracies of MR imaging and helical CT were 55% and 58.6%, respectively, with no statistical significance (overstaging, 10% and 6.9%; understaging, 34.5% and 34.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION MR imaging was comparable to helical CT in the T and N staging of gastric cancer.

[1]  M. A. Meyers Neoplasms of the digestive tract : imaging, staging, and management , 1998 .

[2]  H. Honda,et al.  Efficacy of helical CT in T-staging of gastric cancer. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  G. Mechtersheimer,et al.  MRI for staging of gastric carcinoma: first results of an experimental prospective study. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  J. Yee,et al.  Diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer. , 1996, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  R L Ehman,et al.  MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. , 1995, Radiology.

[6]  J. M. Lee,et al.  MR Imaging of Gastric Carcinoma' Comparison with CT , 1994 .

[7]  C. S. Lee,et al.  Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Zauber,et al.  Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[9]  B. Gross,et al.  Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[10]  W M Thompson,et al.  Primary neoplasms of the hollow organs of the gastrointestinal tract. Staging and follow‐up , 1991, Cancer.

[11]  Margulis Ar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the alimentary tube. , 1991 .

[12]  J. Weinreb,et al.  Improved MR Imaging of the Upper Abdomen with Glucagon and Gas , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.