Performance characterization of nanofiltration membranes based on rigid star amphiphiles.

The objective of this study was to develop new nanofiltration (NF) membranes capable of providing significantly greater water permeability and higher rejection of water contaminants compared to state-of-the-art NF membranes. The active layer of the new NF membranes is prepared with rigid star amphiphiles (RSAs) synthesized as part of this study. Performance characterization for a first generation of RSA membranes in a bench-scale apparatus reveals that most of the new membranes provide water permeability of 1.3-3.1 times that of two commercial NF membranes with polyamide active layers while providing comparable rejection of the organic contaminant surrogate Rhodamine WT. However, the rejection of arsenious acid (H3AsO3) by most new NF membranes was found to be lower than that by the two commercial NF membranes tested. Future research efforts of this study will focus on exploring if H3AsO3 rejection could be significantly increased, without negatively affecting water permeability and organic contaminant rejection, by addition of various chemical groups to RSA hydrophobic cores and hydrophilic branches, and by RSA cross-linking.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[2]  Yasumoto Magara,et al.  Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. , 2002, Water research.

[3]  K. Kimura,et al.  REJECTION OF ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS (DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS, ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS, AND PHARMACEUTICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS) BY NF/RO MEMBRANES , 2003 .

[4]  Walter Hayduk,et al.  Prediction of diffusion coefficients for nonelectrolytes in dilute aqueous solutions , 1974 .

[5]  Jan Hofman,et al.  Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants with cellulose-acetate, polyamide and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes , 1997 .

[6]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Nanofiltration Membranes Based on Rigid Star Amphiphiles , 2007 .

[7]  Soo Young Park,et al.  Mechanical properties and reverse osmosis performance of interfacially polymerized polyamide thin films , 2002 .

[8]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. , 2004, Water research.

[9]  D. Cahill,et al.  Physico-chemical characterization of NF/RO membrane active layers by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry , 2006 .

[10]  G. Amy,et al.  Rejection of Emerging Organic Micropollutants in Nanofiltration–Reverse Osmosis Membrane Applications , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[11]  M. Pilson,et al.  Spectrophotometric determination of arsenite, arsenate, and phosphate in natural waters , 1972 .

[12]  Eric M. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Arsenic removal from drinking water by a “loose” nanofiltration membrane , 2000 .

[13]  Benito Jose Marinas,et al.  Mechanistic interpretation of solute permeation through a fully aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane , 1997 .

[14]  A. Bódalo-Santoyo,et al.  Spiral-wound membrane reverse osmosis and the treatment of industrial effluents , 2004 .

[15]  R. Gimbel,et al.  Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants by nanofiltration , 1997 .

[16]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[17]  Mehmet Kitis,et al.  Microbial removal and integrity monitoring of ro and NF Membranes , 2003 .